The Dopes and Rats who said Donald
Trump could never win the Republican nomination are assuring us that Donald
Trump’s attacks on Shrillda the Hutt will fail.
While pointing out that Trump is “upside down” with women, they insist pointing
out the Hutt’s own miserable 30 year record with women is not smart. I think if all the talking heads who were wrong
and fabulously so think Trump’s tactic is “dangerous” it has to be spot
on.
After the very first debate – you remember
the one where every candidate except Trump raised their hand and vowed to
support the nominee (more on that later) - Charles Krauthammer said the one take away from the debate was that the Trump campaign
was over. Now after Trump has all but secured
the Republican nomination, CK tells us Trump’s campaign needs a new tone and
the attacks on the Hutt will backfire.
Well low and behold, new polls show Trump even with the Hutt in FL and
PA and leading it in OH.
I watched a panel of the Trump primary
bashers with absolutely no self-awareness again assuring us that Trump has to
bend over backward change his persona to bring the #NEVERTRUMP traitors pack on
board. Uh no he doesn’t. These exact same azzbags must have missed the
WV coal miners’ endorsement criticize.
How many #NEVERTRUMP f**k America $h!ts does that cancel out?
The first Republican debate
demonstrated that Trump was honest and JEB!, Gramnesty and others are not. After standing in front of America and
raising their hands promising to support the Republican nominee are now raising
their hands to give the finger to America. They refuse to ride the Trump tiger and Trump
has called them dishonorable. He is of
course absolutely right. There’s video
proof of their lies and dishonor.
Lex battles Annexation
Lex responded to an OpEd piece by a Ft. Wayne City Councilman who claimed to
have an open mind about annexation and “remains persuadable either way”. Here’s
Lex’s response:
I read with interest John
Crawford’s opinion piece in Sunday’s JG.
Crawford assures readers that he “remains persuadable either way” on the
issue of the North 4
Annexation. How very big of Crawford to keep an open mind
on the fate of 22,000 people not a single one of which he legitimately represents. Crawford may be that benevolent dictator
we’ve all been waiting for.
In what world do 5
councilmen and a mayor get to turn the lives of 22,000 people upside down when
none of the 22,000 had an opportunity to vote for any of the councilmen or the
mayor? The Lorax speaks for the trees. Who on the Ft. Wayne City Council speaks for
the 22,000 unrepresented people who live in the North 4 area and overwhelmingly
oppose annexation?
Even Ft. Wayne public
school grads know this nation engaged in a great Revolutionary War over such
issues. Perhaps they could remind their
overlords on the City Council.
For the current citizens of
Ft. Wayne who favor annexation, because misery loves company, think again. Whatever you think of your city services now,
imagine them spread over another 22,000 people and 23 square miles.
Americans can no longer
stand large portions of their government in part because it is populated by
career politicians who are about as popular as an undertaker making the rounds at
the old folk’s home. Career politicians are small people who compensate
for their smallness with huge egos, impenetrable hubris and unbound arrogance.
The fact that
Ft. Wayne cannot grow based upon the merits of being a “well-managed city”
people want to join but rather must resort to strong armed mob style coercion is
a testament to unimaginative career city politicians. They’d rather push the easy way out rather
than doing the difficult work of enticing people into the existing city limits.
End of letter.
Well, well, well it turns out that the
chief proponent of the annexation, Ft. Wayne Mayor Tom had an OpEd on the same
page. It’s here.
Lex responded with a letter to Mayor Henry. In retrospect, I could have stopped after the
first paragraph, but what the heck, I was on a roll.
Mayor Henry your
Sunday OpEd was so comical and self-defeating it left me shaking my head. I wrote a letter to the editor opposing you
harebrained annexation scheme and in it described career politicians generally
as, “small
people who compensate for their smallness with huge egos, impenetrable hubris
and unbound arrogance.” Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for proving my point on
the very same page on the very same day.
You cannot
be serious. You hail Ft. Wayne as a
“best run city” but lament outmigration.
How in the world do you reconcile those two polar opposites? Is it your ego, hubris or arrogance? Did it ever cross your mind that if Ft. Wayne
truly was a “best run city” people wouldn’t be leaving?
If Ft. Wayne
has “the type of swagger that has not been here in years”, why aren’t people
chomping at the bit to get in? Is that
swagger present in the Ft. Wayne’s failing high school system? I don’t see the swagger when I peruse the
Saturday morning JG Metro section. What
keeps you from seeing that adding another 23 square miles of patrol area for
metro police is not going to make an already crime ridden Ft. Wayne any
safer? Is it your ego, hubris or
arrogance? Or is your plan to simply not
patrol the annexed area?
I contend
that Ft. Wayne’s future growth is more closely hinged to the quality of its
school system and the safety of its citizens than any amount square mileage you
and the other megalomaniacs on council can conceive of adding to the city
limits. What keeps you from addressing
the problems right under your noses instead of looking to add a bank of
entirely new problems that are sure to arrive with annexation? Is it your ego, hubris or arrogance?
While I’m
sure there are people inside the North IV Annexation area using city services,
I’m also sure that they paying for them.
Your argument about people coming into the city to eat is
self-defeating. On the one hand you say
the city needs to grow to become a “destination city” then you ridicule people
who use the roads to come into the city to eat but do not want to become
residences of the city. So do you want
people to come to the city or not? Get
with the chamber of commerce and come up with an ad campaign for your backward
thinking. Here’s one: Ft. Wayne where if you come to eat we’ll have
the right to annex you. Or: Fort Wayne a destination city for people who
want to be annexed.
You write, “all of us must grow and compete as
places where residents want to live, work, and play, and businesses want to
invest.” Why have you - as 30+ year politician in Ft. Wayne - been unable to do
that? Lack of imagination? Low energy?
What? What makes you think
exporting your failed policies to annexed areas will help you achieve your
vision? Is it your ego, hubris or
arrogance? And please do not keep saying
a place “where residences want to live”.
What keeps you from understanding the overwhelming majority of the people
within the North IV Annexation area DO NOT WANT TO LIVE INSIDE THE FORT WAYNE
CITY LIMITS? Is it your ego, hubris or
arrogance?
You claim, “In a globally competitive economy, we
can’t simply stand by and let others dictate what the
future holds for us.” Huh? Mr. Mayor, we are not “others”. We are not some unknown people complaining
from some corner of Botswana. We are the
people who live here, raise our families here and work here. That remark demonstrates an arrogance usually
reserved for dictators or football coaches during a halftime speech when
trailing by 7 touchdowns - not anyone seeking comity. You should write a 10,000 word essay
apologizing for that foolish arrogance.
I want to
end by saying, go to hell. Seriously,
just go to hell. That’s how I want to
end, but I won’t. That would be rude, akin
to referring to my family as “others”. So, good day Mr. Mayor. Your annexation plan is foolish, disruptive
and will cause a plethora of problems many of which are unknowable at this
point. There is not one shred of
evidence to indicate that you and the council are up to the task of handling
any of them.