WHAT TO LOOK FOR

I really don't know what to look for in tonight’s debate. The debate is on international affairs so Bush has the clear advantage. Name one issue Kerry's position isn't weak on.

Iraq war – Kerry has at least 10 different positions 5 for, 5 against.

Iran - Edwards' brilliant position is to bribe the Iranians with nuclear (or as GWB says, nuculur) fuel along the lines of the North Korean model that has worked so well. – Yea, right.

North Korea - Kerry wants a unilateral approach when he hammers Bush for being a unilateralist in Iraq.

Troop redeployment's - Kerry advocated the redeployment of troops home until Bush proposed actually doing it, then he was against it - sort of an idiot's argument that goes, “The sun rises in the EAST!” “Oh, no it doesn't. Not if YOU say it does.”

Look for something totally inane along the lines of, "Sen Kerry, who is the leader of Great Britain?" "Tony Blair." "Good, now President Bush, who is the leader of the Eastern Lower Province of the state formerly know as The Federal Republic of Western Upper Kazgistan which we all know was only formally recognized by the exiled leader of the renegade state of Uzgarzitan?"

Also, I don't rule out some disturbance from the audience or major rules violation by Kerry. Look for something totally desperate. No matter what happens, even if Kerry breaks down in tears mid-way thorough the debate and runs off the stage, the willing accomplices in the press will say, "Well, now we know why they call him a great closer. I can feel the race tightening." It's all BS. People with a brain like GWB. They don't like Kerry. If 51% of Americans have brains, there is no problem. OOPS!