If you have three of these,
and you turn the keys over to three of these
Here's what you end up with
Have you noticed how when the divider in chief talks about a “fair share”, he never says exactly what that share is? Why do you suppose that is? It is because most Americans, let’s say 99% because that is popular now, are common sense fair minded people.
If the dopiest Demo-Dope among us said, “The richest 1% are only paying 50% of all federal income tax. That’s outrageous! They should be paying at least 75%.” Most Americans whether rich or poor would disagree with the government confiscating over half the earnings of one of their fellow Americans.
So the dopes are careful never to articulate what the “fair share” should be. If they did, most Americans’ reaction would be, “YGBSM. The government can just steal more than half of a person’s earnings? That’s dangerous.” So it’s all platitudes and generalities about fair shares, balanced approaches and tax breaks for the rich. It’s never anything specific.
And so it will be today. Everyone of the Rrepublican presidential candidates needs to take to the air waves after the dope is done and ask, “Dear Dope, what percentage of someone’s earnings should the government be able to confiscate as their 'fair share'? The richest 1% are paying nearly 50% of all income taxes now. How much more constitutes their ‘fair share’?” Newt ought to make good on his pledge to follow the P-BO around and show up in KS four hours after the P-BO takes off and ask, "Exactly how much is enough, Mr. P-BO?"
For some reason, it never dawns on our guys that Americans, as a group, are a pretty fair minded and savvy people. I think a vast majority would draw a line on government confiscation somewhere under 50%. Here’s why. We know that if the government can take over 50% from the richest among us, it will have very little trouble taking over 50% from the rest of us.
No comments:
Post a Comment