Dope assault on the constitution

Dope assault the First Amendment
While we wait for the funerals of CA massacre victims to begin, the administration’s chief azzbag and law enforcement office Lo Lynch says her “greatest fear” is the rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric.  YGBSM!  Her greatest fear isn’t another Islamo-Terror-Fascist attack?  It isn’t even a sudden shock of global warming?  It isn’t someone invading the “safe space” of some snowflake college baby?  It’s anti-Muslim rhetoric.  And the clueless creep is even willing to jail you under a well know legal standard: if your rhetoric “edges toward violence” Lo and the DoJ will pounce.  Hey, America they locked up the video guy for Benghazi.  I’d take them seriously. 

Besides it’s right there in the constitution:   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Unless of course any of that high-minded stuff is edging toward violence or extreme anti-Muslim speech in the opinion of the sitting Attorney General, in which case such speech is banned and subject to arbitrary confiscation, censorship, blackout and jail time for the perpetrators.

So it’s all right there.  No one can argue the firm legal ground the BS AG is standing on when she threatens to jail you for speaking.  Naturally, a whole host people are calling the BS AG’s bluff by telling the truth about Islam and daring the clueless hack to arrest them.  Let me join the crowd.  HEY LO!  Islam is a murderous cult based on subjugation and trapped in the 7^th century.  The only good thing about the entire cult is they require ugly azz skunks like you and Shrillda the Hutt to cover their butt ugly faces.  Oops, is that extreme?  No.  Not at all.  It’s the truth.

In effort to push her very reasonable theory on terrorism of: “See something, STFU if it involves a member of the religion of destruction”, Lo says she’s going direct her BS DoJ to investigate the arrest and questioning of the lying little koran toting clock boy.  Okay let’s all construct devises just like little clock boy’s, grow a beard, skip showers for a week, throw on a dishdash and dirty sandals and try to get onto a flight with it or enter a federal building with it then sue the government for 15 million when they stop you.

Dope attack on Second Amendment
There is so much wrong, inconsistent and downright loopy about the NY TimesOpEd calling for the confiscation of “certain types of weapons” it would take a month of posts to cover them all in Lex type sarc, junior high name calling and flawed logic. (The much smarter guys at Powerline do it in one post here.)

One line in the OpEd covers all three and tells you everything you need to know about the lefty Lib’s respect for the US Constitution:  “It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment.”  Of course not because like the hoax of global warm-mongering “the debate is over.”  The peculiar wording means whatever the lefty lib’s say it means and 99.5% scientist agree.

Of course in a nation of laws, the NY Times position is absolutely wrong.  It is necessary to debate and litigate the meaning of those peculiar words.  Oh, by the way, the words have been debated numerous times with a consistent outcome upholding the right of American citizens to keep and bear arms.  The words only appear to be “peculiar” to lefty Libs like those populating the NY Times editorial board.  SCOTUS has found the words to be rather normal.

As noted above, the lefty Libs are quite comfortable squelching the free speech of people with whom they disagree.  Lo Lynch will prosecute you for telling the truth about a murderous cult masquerading as a religion.  The Empty Suit will sic his IRS on you for organizing a non-profit political group to oppose his liberty destroying administration.  (So, are you going to trust The Empty Suit and his dumbazz bunch of azzbags to populate the “no fly list”?) Now do you suppose the Times would have a problem if a Republican AG was trying to shut down their BS factory or confiscate the weapons of the force providing security at the Times building?  HEY!  Consistency is the hobgoblin of a small mind.  What’s good for the masses in fly over country may not be so great for the swells at the Times.

The OpEd is considered loopy even among the lefty Libs because the Times lets the cat out of the bag that the goal of the lefty Lib charade of “common sense” gun control is confiscation.   Confiscation with no due process.  What if you do not comply?

  

According to left we can vet Syrian refugees against a data base that does not exist but we cannot vet American citizens to legally purchase a fire arm.

Regular readers of this page know that when faced with “common sense” gun laws from the lefty Libs the real goal was confiscation.  Lex has argued on several occasions that if the lefty Libs want to confiscate our guns they need to get on with the very difficult and politically career ending process of repealing the 2^nd Amendment.  Bottom line the lefty Libs would rather have the issue than solve the problem.  Charles CW Cooke makes many of the samepoints in a more thoughtful, articulate and eloquent way.  Spoiler alert – Cooke sees civil war if the feds try to round up our guns.  Well as Jefferson noted:  The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

The Donald strikes
This piece shoots so may holes in so many myths about the Donald it's very entertaining to watch the Donald's campaign spokesperson destroy the CNN tool.