OK a bit over the top. But how could Omar be much different from the anti-American Rev Wright or Fr. Pfleger?
When the B-HO/Trinity Church scandal broke, Lex pointed out that B-HO’s little problem was with his racist preacher. His big problem was that he belonged to a church full of racists – as evidenced by the mass cheering in the aisles of the “church” whenever something racist was said. We saw that with Rev Wright and again most recently with Fr. Pfleger. Americans can excuse one racist relationship with a beloved but “crazy” uncle or even your own grandmother. But how can you excuse a whole church full of racist relationships? You can’t.
And so, just as B-HO’s religious affiliation with Trinity was founded on political expedience, it was ended. Were the bird-brain just the junior senator from IL, no doubt he’d still be sitting in that church soaking up the political benefits while his dopey wife and innocent daughters soaked up the hate.
But now B-HO is the presumptive presidential nominee of the Dem Party. So Trinity had to go. And the reason given by B-HO and Rev Al Sharpton for B-HO’s departure from Trinity? Well B-HO just couldn’t let the MEDIA ruin his church with all of the media attention.
Sure. It’s all the media’s fault for exposing Trinity’s not so hopeful message rather than the message itself that’s the problem. That makes sense…if you’re a do-as-I-say Lib. If on the other hand you have an ounce of common sense, you’re probably of the opinion that the media didn’t cause the racism that seems to be fundamental to Trinity. You’re probably thinking only an idiot could sit in that church, mingle with loons that cheer its racist tenants, and then say straight-faced that Trinity is not the church it was 20 years ago.
Well then when did it change? Rev Wright was 86ed from B-HO’s presidential announcement in Springfield because B-HO knew Wright had a tendency to say stupid and inflammatory things. So B-HO knew Wright was problem back then. So when did Trinity morph from a church with a message of Christian hope to a “black church” with a racist message of black theology? When did Trinity change and when did B-HO know it had changed? Something tells me the loons didn’t conveniently take over the day after B-HO made his big announcement.
THEN THERE’S THIS: The Griffin notes that he and B-HO got the exact same number of votes in MI – ah nearly one – but B-HO got almost half the Dem delegates. B-HO gets zero votes and yet gets half the delegates. I didn't hear one pundit make this very important point over the weekend. And Dems still have the gall to bitch that there was disenfranchisement in FL in 2000. Hat tip to the Griffin.
1 comment:
Caving in to politcal pressures this candidate (BHO) has decided to forsake his church of 20 years. What does that say about a person's poltical ambitions? Should'nt a candidate say that these are my positions and my beleifs and if they meet the wants of the electorate I am your candidate? Instead we hear too many candidates ask the electorate what they want in a candidate then change their fundamental beliefs to fit the wants of the electorate. Disavow his own chuch? Wow! The red flags should be waving everywhere. Under Slick Willie we saw (besides Monica) a president follow the polls to curry favor with voters. Already most historians have Clinton listed as a great politican that was a terrible president. BHO has shown through this action to place his political ambitions above else. When is the deal done with the devil? Is this another great politican that is internally hollow? Without substance? If Michelle becomes a political liability does she get the axe? How about the kids? This guy can be intimidated to forsake his core being. We don't need him having unconditional meetings with nutball dictators. GWBush probably sleeps soundly every night. I don't beleive Barak can say the same. He is weak and without a moral compass.
The Griffin.
Post a Comment