Law "professor" the P-BO proves he was a pass through

The P-BO is a liar or delusional or some combination of the two. Take this whopper:


Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.

A “strong majority”? Are you nuts? Don’t answer that. Is your memory too short to remember that Demo-Dopes had to use every trick in the book to get your landmark piece of crap passed? Strong majority? You are an idiot. But even an idiot isn’t so dumb as to say that P-BOcare passed with a strong majority. After Scott Brown was elected, Demo-Dopes had to resort trickery and suspension of their own rules to get P-BOcare passed without so much as one Republican vote. They had to lie about the cost. They had to ignore the will of the American people. They had to ignore the bill itself because at 2,700 pages no one read it. To this day, I’ll bet not 10 member of congress have read the entire bill. The only strong majority there has ever been concerning the P-BOcare monstrosity is the people opposing it at every turn.

Then the dope said:

And I'd just remind conservative commentators that, for years, what we have heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism, or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law.

Judicial activism is not striking down an unconstitutional 2,700 page unread law passed in the middle of the night against the will of the people. Judicial activism is making law from the bench. Marbury v. Madison invalidated a law passed by a duly elected congress. The Supreme Court does have the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional. That’s their J-O-B. I think that’s what is referred to as a check or balance or some other quaint thing often referenced when one branch of the government thinks it’s in charge of the whole shooting match.

What the Supremes and other courts do not have the authority to do is issue legislation from the bench like in Roe v. Wade. That is real judicial activism. Abortion would be a lot less volatile issue in the US if the rules governing it were established in legislation rather than from a wrongly decided edict from the bench.

So once again his royal @$$holiness is exactly 180 degrees out of phase. But even a broken clock is correct twice a day. The P-BO miraculously stumbled upon one bit of truth when he noted that the Supremes were unelected. So are your Czars and they don’t even have the benefit of consent of congress that judges do. Neither is the HHS Sec (g)assbag who $h!tcanned the First Amendment implementing P-Bocare an elected offical. Neither is you’re A++++ Energy Sec flushing billions down a green energy sink hole elected. Neither is your absolute disgrace an Attorney General who sells guns to criminals elected. So yeah, sure if you want to play that game, fire your entire @$$clown administration and put them up for a vote.

Lex has noted that the country is subject from time to time to the rule of five. Five Supreme Court Justices often have the fate of the country in their hands. With the current division of the court, it generally boils down to single swing vote, Justice Kennedy. It’s not the best we could hope for but it’s better than letting the P-BO, Pelooser and Land thief Scrawny Harry Reid run thing into the ground unchecked.