Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Catching up

The argument
The world’s dumbest broad - Grand Fran Nan we have to pass it to see what’s in it Peloser - actually said that there is nothing left to cut in the federal budget.  Hmm, how about your government subsidy for Robertscare?  How about we start by cutting that?

That is one argument I do not hear Ted Cruz or anyone else making in loud clear voice.  If Robertscare is soooooooo wonderful, why have you accepted a government subsidy to pay for yours?  I would think that even people who are stupid enough to think Robertscare is a good deal are smart enough to recognize a double standard when they see one.  I’d be hammering that point every chance I got.  Any member who took to the house or senate floor to speak in favor of Robertscare, I’d ask them straight up, “OK fine.  Then  are you going to pay for your own or foist your cost off onto the taxpayer?”

Uh Oh we found something else that’s in in Robertscare
Lex has always been of the opinion that anything the numbskulls in Washington can come with can and will be overcome by the private sector before the law is printed.  Take Robertscare.  We had to pass it to find out what’s in it.  The private sector knows what’s in it.  BS.

The dopes Washington do a fine job telling employers all of the things they must do for their employees with regard to Robertscare.  It’s almost as if someone in Washington has business experience.  What the dopes did in the process is destroy family policies.  Most employers offered family plans for their employees.  Under Robertscare employers are saying, “Fine, we’ll tend to our employees, but we’re cutting their families loose.”  As result an estimated 500,000 children will lose their health coverage formerly covered by an employer policy.  How ironic is that?  Robertscare was supposed to provide "free" coverage for the uninsured.  Now it's creating half a million more of the very people it was supposed to eliminate. 

So, guess who will pick up the tab for all of the uninsured jr.s Robertscare just created?  Mom and dad.  But not to worry jr will be off mom and dad’s policy soon enough.  No wait, jr can stay on mom and dad’s policy until they are 26.  That’s good news for jr. bad news for mom and dad who were looking forward retirement and travel.

Kid at 26?
At age 17 George Washington was surveying the Shenandoah Valley.  We have “progressed” so much as a society that today, we call 26 year olds – “kids.”  Maybe that’s why they never grow up.  They’re off to college for 4-5 or 6-7 years where they rack up tens of thousands of dollars of debt earning an advanced degree in puppetry.  Then they are surprised that there is not an overwhelming demand for people with advanced degrees in puppetry, so they cannot get a job.  Then they’re in mom and dad's basement perfecting their Call of Duty skills for 18 hours a day until they snap and go on a mall shooting spree.  What’s next?  “Your kids can move into the old folks home with you until it’s their turn to move in with their kids.”

Kenyan mall attack
Fortunately, our king has al Qaeda on the run or the mall massacre in Kenya would have been really bad.  Yeah it was really bad, but imagine how really, really bad it would have been if the king hadn’t so thoroughly disabled al Qaeda.  The metric used for “thoroughly disabled” is the same metric used for a job “saved” by the king’s trillion dollar stimulus package.  And just think of the carnage if this act were perpetrated by other than those practicing the “religion of peace.”  Wow, what a mess it would it have been if the Quakers or Mormons showed up in Kenya looking for blood.

No comments: