The argument
The world’s dumbest broad - Grand
Fran Nan we have to pass it to see what’s in it Peloser - actually said that there is nothing
left to cut in the federal budget.
Hmm,
how about your government subsidy for Robertscare?
How about we start by cutting that?
That is one argument I do not hear
Ted Cruz or anyone else making in loud clear voice.
If Robertscare is soooooooo wonderful, why
have you accepted a government subsidy to pay for yours?
I would think that even people who are stupid
enough to think Robertscare is a good deal are smart enough to recognize a
double standard when they see one.
I’d
be hammering that point every chance I got.
Any member who took to the house or senate floor to speak in favor of
Robertscare, I’d ask them straight up, “OK fine.
Then
are you going to pay for your own or foist your cost off onto the taxpayer?”
Uh Oh we found something else that’s
in in Robertscare
Lex has always been of the opinion
that anything the numbskulls in
Washington can
come with can and will be overcome by the private sector before the law is
printed.
Take Robertscare.
We had to pass it to find out what’s in it.
The private sector knows what’s in it. BS.
The dopes
Washington do a fine job telling employers all
of the things they must do for their employees with regard to Robertscare.
It’s almost as if someone in
Washington has business
experience.
What the dopes did in the
process is destroy family policies.
Most
employers offered family plans for their employees.
Under Robertscare employers are saying, “Fine,
we’ll tend to our employees, but we’re cutting their families loose.”
As result an estimated 500,000 children will
lose their health coverage formerly covered by an employer policy.
How ironic is that? Robertscare was supposed to provide "free" coverage for the uninsured. Now it's creating half a million more of the very people it was supposed to eliminate.
So, guess who will pick up the tab for all of the uninsured jr.s Robertscare just created?
Mom and dad.
But not to worry jr will be off mom and dad’s policy soon enough.
No wait, jr can stay on mom and dad’s policy
until they are 26.
That’s good news for
jr. bad news for mom and dad who were looking forward retirement and travel.
Kid at 26?
At age 17 George Washington was
surveying the
Shenandoah Valley.
We have “progressed” so much as a society that
today, we call 26 year olds – “kids.”
Maybe that’s why they never grow up.
They’re off to college for 4-5 or 6-7 years where they rack up tens of
thousands of dollars of debt earning an advanced degree in puppetry.
Then they are surprised that there is not an
overwhelming demand for people with advanced degrees in puppetry, so they
cannot get a job.
Then they’re in mom
and dad's basement perfecting their Call of Duty skills for 18 hours a day until they
snap and go on a mall shooting spree.
What’s
next?
“Your kids can move into the old
folks home with you until it’s their turn to move in with their kids.”
Kenyan mall attack
Fortunately, our king has al Qaeda
on the run or the mall massacre in
Kenya would have been really
bad.
Yeah it was really bad, but imagine
how really, really bad it would have been if the king hadn’t so thoroughly
disabled al Qaeda.
The metric used for “thoroughly
disabled” is the same metric used for a job “saved” by the king’s trillion
dollar stimulus package.
And just think
of the carnage if this act were perpetrated by other than those practicing the
“religion of peace.”
Wow, what a mess it
would it have been if the Quakers or Mormons showed up in
Kenya looking
for blood.
No comments:
Post a Comment