I did a mental exercise of ranking the
GOP candidates 1 through whatever we’re up to today with a quick after blurb.
Walker:
Tough strong leader. Doesn’t
really care about what the MSM think about him.
He will do what is right. Won
three elections in purple WI. Smashed
teacher’s union in WI and signed bill limiting abortion to 20 weeks. He flopped on immigration but has since
flipped to the correct position. No
college sheepskin – Mr. Everydayman.
Successful governor which is a big plus.
Cruz:
Totally without fear of the Dopes, the Rats and the MSM. When he and his supporters got called “wacko birds”
by John McCain - who always reserves his toughest criticism for fellow
Republicans – Cruz did not respond by giving out McCain’s personal cell phone
number or questioning McCain’s war record.
Ivy league debate champ who would destroy the pig in a pantsuit in a
national debate – even one where “I’ve eaten too much Candy” Crowley inserted
her rather rotund self into the debate.
Too bad he’s a senator. Has the advantage
of being a mino.
Fiorina: Bashes the Shrilldabeast at every opportunity
like Bears’ fans bash their hapless QB Jay Cutler. Very measured, very professional, other than
disagreeing with Trump’s tone on immigration, I’ve not heard one thing from her
that I disagree with. A big plus is that
she is a non-Caligula, D.C. insider. Has
the advantage of being a member of the majority that is seen as a mino.
Carson:
Honest non-pol who speaks the truth plainly. Sort of a Donald Trump without the money and
bombast. An amazing story of hope and great
accomplishment - sort of the anti-Empty Suit who has a story of flimflam and
whining about things that NEVER happened to him in his sheltered affirmative action pass
through life. Carson is the most likable
guy in the field.
Jindal: Also a very likeable guy with a
great personal story. He’s a successful governor who communicates
well. Also a visible mino.
Rubio:
Slid out of Lex’s top tier for three reasons: 1) Gang of eight
immigration 2) Voted to give TES fast track trade authority 3) Tells us we have
to accept the SCOTUS ruling on homosexual marriage, uh, no we don’t. I’ll accept homosexual marriage when the left
accepts the 2nd Amendment. Has a great life’s story. Articulates conservatism well and may be the
best in the field on foreign policy. Too
bad he’s a senator.
Paul:
Libertarian conservative. Will
cave on all manner of social issues.
Best announced tax policy – flat at 14.5%. Paul can go on campus and into mino
communities without being booed. He’s
perhaps the only Republican candidate that can pull that off. Would definitely expand the GOP base in a
general election. Too bad he’s a
senator.
Perry:
Has spent way too much time whining about and name calling of Trump. Too bad for Perry, Trump is right about
immigration and the VA. When you are as
low in the polls as Perry you have to do something to break out. Hint to Perry and the others: don’t try to
break out by attacking Trump. You will
lose. Perry’s a retread from the last cycle
with nothing new to add.
Santorum: Nice guy. Strong conservative in a field with a lot of
strong conservatives. Another failed
retread from the last cycle. No reason
for him to be in the race this time around.
Christie: Straight shooter. Said he’d enforce federal law on sanctuary
cities and states that legalized marijuana.
Flopped on immigration and common core, but has since flipped to the
correct side. Disappointing convention
speech for Romney. Perfectly acceptable
candidate.
Kasich:
A nice guy, successful governor from an important state. Why do I get the feeling he’s running for VP?
Bush:
Wrong on immigration. Wrong on
common core. Kind of a squish on
everything else. He’s the establishment
candidate, so he’s immediately suspect.
But I’ve voted for him three times when I lived in FL, so how bad can he
be?
Pataki:
Why is this guy in the race? His
platform, like Perry’s, appears to be, Donald Trump is destroying the
Republican Party. No. The Republican Party is destroying the
Republican Party. It really doesn’t need
any help. The GOP is loaded top to
bottom with weak Caligula, D.C. go along to get along insiders who wouldn’t
tell the truth if you water boarded the bastards (Boehner, McConnell et al) for
a week. The exceptions can be counted before
running out of digits on both hands – Cruz and Sessions are a couple of the
exceptions.
Huckabee: Puleeez.
Graham:
Clever TV ad of him destroying his cell phone after Trump announced Graham's personal cell phone number on TV. Other
than that, Graham has “crossed the aisle” so often it’s hard to tell which side
the aisle he belongs on.
1 comment:
From the Griffin...
First, the MSM cannot focus on one person to beat on for the next 16 months. It ticks them off and they complain about it. Second, I will take any one of them versus the Pantsuit-Rape Enabler. Watch the MSM lose their minds a few days before next month's debates. How could they possibility do a good credible lie-fest beat down on everyone of the 16-17 candidates?
Post a Comment