The Catholic
Church embraces science. The Catholic
Church, among other things, developed the scientific method and first proposed “the
big bang theory” (the scientific version not the TV show). Still the Church whiffs at science from time
to time. There’s the whole Galileo
thing. Galileo’s persecution was bad
enough, but it then took 350 years for the Church to rectify the matter and
admit the Galileo was correct – the Earth is NOT the center of the universe.
In last week’s
Catholic Times the US Council of Catholic Bishops, surprise-surprise, condemned
PDJT for extracting the US from the debacle known as the Paris Accords on
Climate Change. The Catholic Times ran a
feature article on the subject here. The
article was not fair. It was not
balanced. It is full of inaccuracies, falsehood and relies on consensus as
proof rather than science, yet it was published as if climate change is part of
the gospels.
The only
difference between the Catholic Church’s position on climate change and their treatment
of Galileo is that there is no climate change inquisition…yet. One other difference is that after 350 years
there will be no admission that the Church got it wrong. Instead there will another of the rather unending dire predictions stating that we
only have 10 years left to save the planet.
In my mind
letting this kind of nonsense pass without comment is akin to Muslims sitting
quietly while their fellow followers of the religion of peace go about slicing
off peoples’ heads. So I sent a note to the
editors:
Dear Editor:
Did anyone read
the subject article? I hope the answer is
no. Not having read it would at least give
you plausible denyabity for approving the error filled rubbish contained
therein.
A few of the most
egregious errors:
The US has never
made a “commitment” to the Paris Climate Accord. Therefore it would be impossible to decide
“not to honor the US commitment.”
If you happen to
think that affordable energy for poor people is a good thing, President Trump’s
decision will actually help the poor and vulnerable.
It was
interesting to learn that the “entire Catholic Church [has] consistently upheld
the Paris agreement.” I’m a practicing
Catholic. I do not uphold the Paris
agreement or most “climate change” propaganda. Am I still Catholic?
Then there’s this
absolute stunner. “President Obama
ratified on its own, bypassing the US Senate.”
That non-sentence is the perfect passage for the entire article, bad
English asserting a falsehood. Mr.
Editor, ratified what?
I have searched
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution, and I cannot find the
part that says that the president can ratify a treaty “on its own, bypassing
the US Senate.”
Even the photo
shown with the article is garbage. I’m
old enough to remember when global cooling was going to destroy the
planet. During that now debunked hysteria,
the little town I grew up in experienced a heavy down pour one summer day. As a result, the streets and many of the basements
in the lower end of town were flooded…for about 2 hours. 40+ years later, the town is still there, and
as far as I know, hasn’t flooded to that extent since. When the pond in my front yard floods in the
spring, it usually portends a good year for farmers. So what the picture accompanying the article
tells me is that it might be a once in a 100 year occurrence or bumper year for
crops in Hammond, LA.
I’m still silly
enough to think Catholic bishops and publications ought to deal in the truth
not political propaganda.
“Those who hope
in the Lord will renew their strength.”
Those who hype climate change will engage in Democrat/globalist
propaganda.
Lex on a roll - correct about the shape
shifter again
Uh, I think if you check the post two under, we can put another check in the “Lex was right” column. The shifter is in line for a 10 million dollar book deal. Here’s the perfect photo for the cover with proposed title.
Uh, I think if you check the post two under, we can put another check in the “Lex was right” column. The shifter is in line for a 10 million dollar book deal. Here’s the perfect photo for the cover with proposed title.
Best Comey Joke: When asked why he let Shrillda the Hutt off the hook despite the mountain of evidence against her, Comey replied, "I don't always let proven criminals off the hook, but when I do it's because, while investigating her illegal e-mail server, I found my own suicide note."
One article has it all
Love this piece. If you’re strapped for time go to last few lines.
Love this piece. If you’re strapped for time go to last few lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment