While Scared Harry and Queen General Nancy are doing their damnedest to surrender America’s national interests to Islamo-Terror-Fascists in Iraq, our head guy, Gen. David H. Petraeus, reported that the surge was showing positive results and a pullout would hurt the war effort. Scared Harry said, even before Patraeus testified, that he “wouldn’t believe him.” I’m sure the next thing out of the Scared One’s mouth was, “of course I support the troops, just not the dishonest, lying, conniving generals that lead them.”
Joe Lieberman has an OpEd piece in the Washington Post today calling out what passes for leadership in the DemoRAT Party. Here’s the nut of Sen. Lieberman’s piece,
“The challenge before us, then, is whether we respond to al-Qaeda's barbarism by running away, as it hopes we do -- abandoning the future of Iraq, the Middle East and ultimately our own security to the very people responsible for last week's atrocities -- or whether we stand and fight.
“To me, there is only one choice that protects America's security -- and that is to stand, and fight, and win.”
Given that it’s the party that you choose to caucus with that is attempting to perpetrate the very policy upon us that you warn against, we ask, "Where have you gone, Joe LIEBERMAN? Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you." Alas, Joe knows that further Republican losses are likely in the senate ’08. It’s all numbers. Reps have 21 seats at risk. Dems have 12.
So what game is Joe playing? Is it more important for him to be in the majority caucus than stand up for American interests? I don’t know either.
No comments:
Post a Comment