Uh oh, more trouble for the global warm-mongers. Another 2.5 inches of global warming was dumped on fabulous Ft. Wayne yesterday. That makes 13-14 inches for the month. But as one warm-monger noted, weather isn’t climate.
No, mere record amounts of snow and cold is not climate. To be “climate” it must be collected from temperature stations located on airport runways so as to collect the heat from jet exhaust, or next to an air conditioning unit, or on a blacktop parking lot. Then, any data from a station that does not comport to the desired out come is thrown out and ignored. Then when the data still doesn’t add up to the desired outcome, the records are lost and the report is simply made up out of whole cloth. Then, anyone who might say, “Whoa, hold on there Skippy. Let’s check this out before we destroy every Western economy in the world” is compared to a Holocaust denier. When all of that happens, only then do you have “climate.”
Now one of the originators of the global warming hoax, Dr. Phil Jones, late of the East Anglia CRU, has made several stunning admissions:
1. The globe may have been warmer during the Middle Ages – for all of the public school grads, that would be well before SUVs
2. It is nearly impossible to determine temperatures from 100s of years ago with any accuracy, so that the reports comparing today’s temps with those of 100s of years ago are pretty much just made up hokus pokus
3. And…wait for it…wait for it…there has been NO STATISTICTACLLY SIGNIFICANT WARMING for the last 15 years when accurate data - such as it is given the dishonst people collecting it - is actually available
Does any of this make any difference to warm-mongers? Not only no but hell no! After all of this comes out, I actually heard someone argue on Fox Special Report that, well sure the global warm-mongering scientific community is made up of liars, cheats and charlatans no doubt, but we “know” that 2009 was the second warmest year on record. How do we “know” that? Why should we believe anything warm-mongers tell us?
In proof positive that it is easier to fool a jug eared Harvard educated Dope than the average plumber with a high school diploma, even Dopulous took to the stage yesterday and announced an initiative to build 3 nuclear power plants as means to combat global warm-mongering. Idiot! And I’ll believe this high-functioning moron is interested in nuclear power when the plants come on line.
Even if these fools are right, they have so damaged their own credibility among thinking people that the Earth will have to be a smoldering cinder before they taken seriously again. And if they are right and seriously believe they are right, why do they have to lie and cheat to make the numbers add up?
But in really important news read this.
2 comments:
What if you're wrong Lex?
What if this is not a big-government, liberal conspiracy?
Do you have any idea about the consequences of inaction on this matter?
You, because you have not done your research and looked into the data before ranting about how it's all a big joke, will have helped rob your own children and grandchildren of a better life. I hope you can live with that in 30 years.
As an actual working climate scientist, I hope every single day that we are all wrong, but it really just doesn't look like we are. Humans are causing the planet to warm - do the research and it will make sense to you too. A good place to start is realclimate.org, run by real working climate scientists.
The way to proving a theory has traditionally been recognized as generating data, a hypothesis, experimentation, and independent validations. I have spent 25 years in test and measurement methods for data collection. I am not an expert in climate research, but I have yet to see the theory proven that man is creating global climate change. I have no political or financial gain or loss to consider nor any political agenda. Until the theory can be proven it remains “unproven”. Can anyone show me otherwise?
The Griffin.
Post a Comment