Thursday, July 08, 2010

DoJ incompetent morons and racists

Uh oh, maybe we’re not a nation of cowards after all. While DoJ is out looking to kick the state of Arizona’s @$$ for doing what Fedzilla refuses to do, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is looking into something else the feds apparently are not too interested in doing, prosecuting blatant civil rights violators – if the violators happen to be black.


We have all seen the video of the New Black Panthers blocking the entrance of a polling place in Philly, while issuing racial slurs, carrying clubs and dressed paramilitary gear. Yesterday, Lex linked to a disturbing video of one of the NBP defendants in the Philly case advocating the murder of white people (aka crackers) and their children.

Seems the only race cowards that can be identified in this case are AG Eric the Wad Holder himself and his happy band of DoJ lemming running their own affirmative action program for black law breakers out of the basement of the Kennedy building in D.C.

On Tuesday a DoJ spokesman claimed "the facts and the law did not support pursuing claims". Do you know what that means? It means one of three things. First, that the lawyers at DoJ have to be the most incompetent bunch of legal minds in the world. They are. DoJ had already won a default judgment. All that was left was the sentencing portion of the case. But then the P-BO administration moved to dismiss the charges after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012. Huh? So it will be OK to bring a deadly weapon to the polling place after 2012? That’s good information to know. But according to whistle blower J. Christian Adams, DoJ decided to drop the case for nothing more than racial reasons.

The second thing a DoJ spokesman claiming "the facts and the law did not support pursuing claims" could mean is that DoJ is populated with bunch of morons. It is. The case was on a video that even Joe Biden could see and understand. They had already won. Fact and law? The facts are clear, and I suspect had David Duke shown up in Harlem with a bunch of club wielding white supremacist, we’d find out that the law is clear as well.

The last thing a DoJ spokesman claiming "the facts and the law did not support pursuing claims" could mean is that DoJ is being run by a bunch of racists clowns. It is. Given the circumstances outlined in above, what other rational explanation is there?

But wait! There’s more. Were this set of circumstances not bad enough – and let’s face it they pretty bad – DoJ is trashing the whistle blower who brought to light DoJ’s policy of letting racist black poll intimidators off the hook Scott free. A disgruntled employee claims the DoJ. Well hell yeah. He is disgruntled because the DoJ is populated by a bunch of race baiting morons.

Take the circumstances of the this case and juxtapose them against the AZ case that the DoJ is pursuing with vim and vigor. Everyone in this administration declared the AZ law discriminatory – before they had even read the damn thing. P-BO said and continues to say that the AZ law has potential for abuse but refuses to list one single other law that doesn’t have POTENTIAL for abuse. So blatant racists in Philly caught on tape get off hook but AZ is dragged into court for POTENTIAL abuse.

Yes America this all happening right here at home, right now. It isn’t some third world country where these things are happening – yet.

No comments: