Cat out as Boy Scout sponsor

Well it appears that there is nothing gay about the homosexual response to the Boy Scout’s half-@$$ed resolution on the subject of homosexual Scouts. It seems IL giant Corp. Caterpillar is cutting support to the Scouts for not going all the way with homosexuals by allowing homosexual leaders as well as homosexual Scouts. There’s also the news that Boy Scouts have marched in at least one homosexual pride parade in uniform. No word yet on whether the Scouts were required to tie their shirt tails in square knots above their trousers so as to expose their midriffs.


A couple of posts under Lex noted the total BS of the Boy Scout’s position would cause more trouble than it would solve. And wa-la, there you have it. Nothing short of two Scouts kissing while two adult leaders holding hands look on approvingly, on the cover of the new Boy Scout Handbook will get the Scouts out of the mess they have created for themselves.

It seems to me the sooner religious groups get the heck out the better off their youth programs will be. The Scout troop Lex Jr. is involved with is totally self sufficient. In fact, it would be better off financially by dumping the Boy Scouts, because there would be no dues requirements.

With the help of St. Vincent’s church the troop has, built a Scout Lodge with three detached buildings, bought two busses, a couple of trailers, canoes, enough camping gear for a battalion of Marines, ski equipment, a dozen rifles, built a first-class climbing wall and provided a safe environment for 10,000s of youths through the years.

They could change the name out front from St. Vincent’s Scout Lodge to St. Vincent’s Youth Lodge and not miss a beat. In fact, they could actually improve the program by removing a layer of bureaucracy – the Boy Scouts of America -from the equation.

They should do it. They could advertise a sex free zone where kids can be kids in a Christian atmosphere without the intrusion of self-loathing liberal BS.

They could offer an a-la-carte menu of events centered on camping and other outdoor activities that kids could choose from and as kids demonstrated the skills obtained, they can move up the leadership ladder. Parents could pay for the events out of pocket or kids could earn the money for their chosen events by working the various fund raisers for the organization.

Now, for today’s totally unrelated paragraph:

I like beer, nay love beer, since “love” seems to be the determining factor in things today. If I love it apparently I have a civil right to it.  I don’t know if I was born that way or if I acquired a taste for the stuff. The Boy Scouts frown on alcohol consumption at their events. This is total BS. If I was born with a “love” for beer, I should be able to drink it wherever and whenever I want. I should be able to force my love for beer onto everyone in my proximity.  It's my civil right, because I love it.  They must accept it, support it and force their kids to accept it as well. After all I was born that way - probably. The Boy Scouts should adopt a resolution allowing moderate consumption of beer at their events as long as no one gets drunk, or at least not too drunk. After all, there are far more beer drinkers than homosexuals. And what about the civil rights of beer drinking homosexuals?

That, Mr. & Mrs. America, is iron clad logic. It cannot be denied. Where else do you get this kind of stuff?