Let's talk commonsense gun control

Okay, now it’s time to start the conversation on gun control.  I’ll go first.  We know what the Lefty Libs want – a ban on all hand guns and rifles.  We know that is the end goal.  We know that the lying azzbag Lefty Libs will lie through their butts about the goal. We are not fools. We know what the Peloser and Chuckles the clown want.

So let’s start the conversation by pointing out the obvious obstacle to the kind of “commonsense gun control” the Dopes want  - the 2^nd Amendment: 

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

The last four words of the 2^nd Amendment make it clear that congress cannot infringe on the right to keep bear and bear arms.  They already have, but to pass the kind of commonsense gun control the Lefty Libs want it will be sure to bump against the 2nd Amendment and “infringe” on the rights of the people to keep and bear arms.  They know it.  We know it.  So let’s just get it out in the open.  Commonsense gun control will require an amendment to the constitution.  

So lefty libs, what should the 2^nd Amendment look like?  How should it be amended to accommodate your commonsense changes?  Put it down on paper and sign it so we all know your desired end state.  After that we’ll start the conversation. 

The Lefty Libs will never agree to such a conversation.  They know the only way to reach their goal is like cooking lobster, slowly turn up the heat so that it’s nearly imperceptible to the target. Then when the target finally figures out what’s happening, it’s too late.

Azzbag Lefty Libs know that they cannot win this if their end state were identified.  They know they cannot win this through a vote by the American people.  So they just incrementally restrict this, then that bit by bit.

Okay azzbagz the conversation has begun.  Jimmy Kimmle, you’re an expert on guns, medical policy, space exploration, castration of alligators, tree trimming, computer verification, geometry, time space continuum theory and anything else the Demo-Party demands you carry water for them on, what should a 21^st century 2^nd Amendment look like?

Infidel nails it
In the comment section in the post two under, Infidel nails the shooter’s methods and equipment.

I felt certain the weapon had to be belt fed because the length of the bursts.  I limited my scope of investigation to my own experiences.  Why in the world would I take 3 minutes to look on the Interweb for a maximum capacity magazine when I already knew it was 30 rounds?  I knew it’s 30 rounds because I’ve never seen one that holds more than 30 rounds, and a 30 round magazine would not be sufficient sustain fire for the length of time of the bursts on video.  Who knew they made 50-60 round magazines?  The Infidel.

So Dr. Robertson was 100% correct when he told us, “It’s not what you don’t know that gets you into trouble.  It’s what you think you know that isn’t so that will cause you problems.”

I also had never heard of a “bump stock” until yesterday.  I thought messing with the internal mechanisims of the weapon was the only to make it fully automatic.  The bump stock devise shows how hard it is to legislate gun control.  The morons making the laws are generally about ½ as clever as the people they are trying to regulate.  Look at tax laws.  The congress legislates.  The smart people they are trying to regulate figure 50 ways around what the azzbag Caligula, D.C. ruling class dopes put in place before the ink dries on the president’s signature.

Let me wrap this up by saying F-the-NFL.  Fortunately, the Mon night ratings were in the toilet.  Keep it up Richard Craniums.  You're doing a heck of a job.