Disgruntled and cowardly employees are common, make bad witnesses

The NY Times published an anonymous op-ed from a guy who claims he’s part of the resistance inside PDJT’s administration. Could be true.  The guy could be the guy who sits at the third desk on the right inside the NY Times.

It’s probably true.  Who hasn’t been part of a large organization or sports team where there wasn’t some sad sack trying to make himself look good by making other people look bad.

The rat is usually some utility player filling in for a starter for a play when the starter’s chin strap breaks.  Later at the rat tells everyone the starter is the coach’s pet and based on his one play in the game, the rat should take the starters place.

On the job some loud-mouthed slacker is always trashing the boss behind his back.  He might be an average or even above average worker when closely supervised. When left on his own he becomes Walter Mitty telling anyone who will listen about his heroic efforts saving the company singlehandedly from the bubbling boss. 

We all know the type.  The NY Times has to know the type as well.  So why allow a disgruntled employee an anonymous platform? 

Well it’s the McCain funeral rule.  If you’re not going to trash PDJT – Sarah Palin – you’re not invited.  It’s really no more complicated than that. When you’ve got a well-placed mole inside the “enemy camp” the last thing yu want is for him to be exposed.  So you chuck journalistic standards – such as they are the NY Time – and give the whiner an anonymous platform.

This comes on the heels of the anonymously sourced Woodward book that, in my opinon, was dead on arrival when Gens Mattis and Kelley made it clear either Woodward is a liar or the people he talked to are liars.  Of course that is not the lead on any of the Trump Derangement Syndrome MSM outlets i.e.: Woodward book torpedoed by multiple “sources”     

Instead the MSM azzbags report as if every word in the steaming pile of excrement is the gospel.  The same guy who penned the NY Times op-ed is probably one of Woodward’s key “sources”. 

And yes hiding behind anonymity is a cowardly act.  PDJT called the coward’s op-ed treason with a question mark.  Certainly it’s not treason.  It is clearly sedition:  Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that tends toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent towards, or resistance against established authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interest of sedition. 

The left calls themselves “the resistance”. Sedition? The Left is on a jihad against PDJT.  They are sowing violence (Antifa), subverting the constitution (2A, free speech, right to peaceably assemble).  Sedition?  The NY Times op-ed writer openly promotes the inteerst of sedition.  Seditionist? Yes, yes and yes.

The leftist Wyle E. Coyote, super genius, has a new acme anvil, in the form of an anonymous op-ed from a coward, which is only the, what, 100^th sure-fire seditious scheme to bring down the duly elected President of the United States and subvert the constitution.  We know how this ends.  The anvil will fall directly on the leftist scum’s head.