Libs, Libs and Democrats

Juan Williams
After being sacked by NPR, Juan Williams just signed a 2 million dollar contract with Fox. Does this mean that all of NPR’s “talents” will be going off the NPR reservation in hope of getting a bigger contracts and audiences with Fox? Probably not.


I saw this Williams thing yesterday and had meant to comment on it but the rant on DADT went long, and to be honest, I saw something shinny and just forgot about Williams.

So Williams gets canned from NPR where no one heard him anyway. He gets a huge pay raise from Fox where he’ll reach 100 times as many people. It sounds as if Juan might have landed on his feet.

NPR on the other hand has been condemned from left, right and center for firing Williams. Its head, some ditz, Vivian Schiller proved that you can be an idiot and a mean spirited idiot all at the same time when she told an audience that Williams should have kept his feeling about Muslims between himself and "his psychiatrist or his publicist."  Yeah I fired him, but that shouldn't stop me from kicking him while he's down.

Never has one firing done so much good. Williams has landed on his feet after a Lib on Lib food fight. Schiller is in jam of her own idiocy, and NPR is finally going to be investigated by congress and lose its public funding.

I like Williams. But had I known so much good would come from his firing, I’d have called for it years ago.

Lib Victory either way in Nov
How great is it to be a Lib? They are in a win-win situation come Nov 2nd. If they win, they can raise taxes. If they lose, they can just send whatever they think is their fair share into the federal government.

Imagine if the shoe were on the other foot. If Republicans win, taxes go down. If Republicans lose, we just send in what we think is our fair share.  I know I’d save several thousand dollars under that arrangement.

But have you noticed that when P-BO, the Slickmeister Clinton, Soros, Buffet et al talk bout how rich people like them ought to be paying more taxes, no one ever challenges them to just send it in?
Dear NRA:
I was considering becoming a life member. Not anymore. Your endorsement of Brad Ellsworth in the Indiana senate race has me considering weather or not I want to renew my annual membership.

I understand that the NRA is a single issue organization. I might even believe that Democrat Ellsworth has a better record on gun issues than his Republican opponent Dan Coats. But the NRA had better begin to look at party politics.

No party votes in complete lock step like Democrats over the last two years. How does the NRA think we were saddled with mandatory national health care? The Democrat Party, that’s how.

Ellsworth’s record may be one thing, but the NRA has to know that his party would love to see restrictions on gun ownership and ammunition purchases. The NRA might take a day to study what the long-term effects on gun issues are likely to be if Ellsworth, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and Barak Obama continue with unchecked power.

Coats is the obvious choice for thinking Indiana gun owners - if for no other reason than to act as a check to the gun grabbing Democrats who dominate Washington, D.C. today. But the NRA wants to send more Democrats to Washington?

Wake up. Reject all Democrat candidates until the party signs a plank in its national platform that recognizes that the Second Amendment says what it says.