WE HAVE THE F-ING TRANSCRIPT!!!

Someone has some splainin’ to do with regard to PDJT’s phone call with the Ukrainian president. Adam the bug eyed pencil neck liar Schi(t)ff keeps calling in witnesses to tell us what they heard or what someone told them they heard on the phone call.  One problem for the Dopes and Shifty with that BS, WE HAVE THE F-ING TRASCRPIT!!

PDJT played Road Runner to Shifty’s Wiley E. Coyote.  PDJT’s unprecedented release of the transcript definitely caught Grand Nan from San Fran Peloser and Shiffty short. They appear to be too stupid to adjust their coup plans.  They continue to bring forth witnesses to testify about what they heard or what someone told them they heard or what they supposed PDJT might say on such a phone call a la Shifty’s theater of the lie during his open hearing where he read a lie into the congressional record.  HEY DOPES!!! WE HAVE THE F-ING TRANSCRIPT!!!

So what can anyone add or detract to that fact.  Enter LTC Vindman.  He added that he “was concerned” about the phone call.?.  WTF.  He’s probably also concerned about PDJT’s twitter habits, the way he wears his hair, the way ties his ties a bit longer than most, and on and on.  The fact that a lowly Caligula, D.C. deep state Army LTC is “concerned” about something is evidence of…what…Oh…exactly NOTHING.

I do not know Vindman. The fact that he admitted to leaking/sharing information of a phone call by the President of the United States with a foreign power does not reflect well on him. As far as I know, officers are still swearing an oath to the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.  Sharing a call from POTUS with a foreign nation would seem to be a rather clear violation of his oath and probably a dozen or so laws regarding the handling classified material.

ASIDE:  Looking at the pics of Vindman my first question would be: LTC Vindman are you now or have you ever been on the Army’s weigh control program.  He looks like a bit of porker.  That uniform can hide a lot of pounds.  It’s his round face and over full cheeks that give him away. 

Then there’s the note that Vindman’s recollection of the call doesn’t match the transcript.  Happens to me all the time.  I think I heard the doctor telling me something like, “You can eat whatever you want in any amount.”  Mrs. Lex corrects that recollection, “No he said, ‘You can’t eat whatever you want in any amount and expect to maintain your weight.”  That’s not what I heard.

Vindman places his version over that of the people responsible for transcribing the call.  I’m not saying Vindman is lying, but he might be.  What do others recall about the conversation? Is Vindman an outlier?  Do others have the same recollection?  I don’t know.  

I suspect that it’s a lot like any event witnessed by any group of people. People will hear and see the same event differently as it is filtered through their own perspective and biases.  I’m absolutely certain that there are any number of (M)ichigan fans that still think they should have won last year’s game where The OSU hung 62 on the boys from up north. So it may be with Vindman.  What’s the consensus of those on the call?  I suggest the consensus is what is in the transcript.

Last thing on this.  If Vindamn had so much “concern” about the Commander in Chief, he had a responsibly to express that concern to the chain of command.  If the situation wasn’t resolved, he then had a duty to resign.  After resigning he could then go public.  That fact that he went public and he’s still around is proof positive – to me anyway - that he’s a deep state plant. Getting PDJT is more important to this guy than doing his duty. Also, all officers “serve at the pleasure of the president.”  PDJT should fire the azzweasel by sundown today. At least get him the hell out of the White House.