The creepy @$$ ever grinning State's Attorney at her post acquittal presser made me think she had been drugged.
At the same presser, the creepy @$$ all cracker prosecuting attorneys seemed willing to stoke the flames of civil unrest all while pretending they “respected the jury’s decision.”
Creepy @$$ cracker if there ever was one, Harry the roach Reid said this isn't over with the feds should get involved. The Feds cannot scratch their own asses with out effing it up.
Was justice served? In the sense that there was, by all accounts, a fair trial that aired all of the available evidence, made strong arguments on both sides, had a jury agreed upon by both sides weigh the evidence and arguments, had a judge that moved proceeding along and made rulings, yeah justice was served.
Justice being served doesn’t mean you have to agree with the jury’s decision. We all know by the available evidence, that OJ is guilty as hell of double homicide. The agreed upon jury, having heard all of the evidence and all of the arguments, acquitted White Hispanic George Zimmerman of all charges. That is the only similarity between guilty as hell OJ and reasonable doubt George Zimmerman.
Let’s be honest. The race baiters were never interested in justice. They were interested the lime light and a guilty verdict. That’s it. There was never a mention of a fair trial and accepting a verdict of not guilty. There was, on the other hand, a lot of talk of riots if Zimmerman was acquitted. They wanted a show trial were Zimmerman was hung out to dry. Even that wasn’t enough for some who tweeted placing Zimmerman in the prison’s general population so he could be murdered there.
Now, I didn’t watch the trial on TV, and I’m not lawyer, but I did watch the recap on Greta every night – and stayed at a Holiday Inn Express a couple of years ago. So I feel as qualified as any other bystander to make an assessment of the case. As in the Casey Anthony case, the grinning baboon in the person of the State Attorney, at a minimum over-charged Zimmerman. By all accounts there was no chance of proving 2nd degree murder. Once you go down the road of over-charging your left trying to get Zimmerman on something else anything else - child abuse as a lesser included offense, jay walking, littering - anything. When that happens, people watching from afar get the State’s point.
That point is simple, “We know Zimmerman is guilty of something. A dead 17 year old is all the proof we need for that. Now by God he needs to pay, irrespective of the evidence.”
By my by-stander qualifications, the State never had a case for anything. They proved nothing other than what was known before going to trial, that George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin. On the other hand, the defense exceeded their burden of reasonable doubt by presenting a credible case that Zimmerman, after having sustained visible injuries, was in reasonable fear of his life.
And for the “it was just a fist fight” crowd, let a 17 year old punch you in the face in the dark, get on top of you and repeatedly hit you in the face and pound your head into a concrete sidewalk. Now argue it was “just a fist fight.” I don’t know if the defense made this point, but consider that Zimmerman had no idea when or even if, having gained the upper hand, Trayvon Martin would stop beating him before he lost consciousness and what would happen if he did. Would the teen get up and kick him in the head 4 or 5 times? Take Zimmerman’s own gun and shoot him? Yeah, in this day and age I’d have feared for my life as well.
Then consider the railroad job Zimmerman got to appease Revs? Al and Jess. The
Even now indication are that Dos-cJ is looking at civil rights charges against Zimmerman. I’d look for the feds to show up in the middle of the night and whisk Zimmerman away. Oh you don’t think so? Ask the filmmaker fingered for the
1 comment:
From The Griffin...
Hey, let's have a national conversation about race in America! Seems liberals always call for "a national conversation" when things go sideways for them. Of course you cannot have a conversation about race. Every other word is "a dog whistle". Just ask Prissy Mathews the meaning of "Chicago". The Zimmerman trial is about a Peruvian-white-black person and a black teenager, with an all white female jury, a black city manager, and race baiters Jackson and Sharpton. No middle aged white guys to try and heap guilt onto. The middle aged white guys don't have a seat at this table. What is "a national conversation" anyway? It sounds like a politically correct BS session with no end. We just had the 150th anniversary of Gettysburg where we had a hardcore "national conversation" about race with powder and lead. Everyone knows the conversation so is left to talk about?
Post a Comment