Two criminals, peas in a pod or punks from the same gang |
The most
hilarious part was Justice Breyer’s opinion in which he stated, “The senate is
in session when the senate says it is in session.” Wow! In
other shocking news: Wal-Mart is open
when they say they are open. The menu at
McDonald’s is what McDonald’s says the menu is.
The name of the Washington Redskins is what the owner says it
is…No. Wait.
I do not fault Breyer for pointing out the
obvious. It had to be done. Brayer’s assertion is so obvious only a
narcissistic, know-nothing, azzbag like King SFB could have missed it. So it was up to Breyer to point out to King
SFB that 2 + 2 still equals 4. Just
because SFB fancies himself king, he cannot change the equation.
I’ve
often claimed on this page that King SFB is NOT a great thinker. A smarmy thinker of high order – definitely. SFB makes Eddie Haskell look like Father
Flannigan. He can weasel, lie, connive,
obfuscate, cover up and BS better than anyone drawing a breath on God’s green
orb today.
But left
to his own devices he couldn’t figure out how to pour pi** out of a boot if the
directions were written on the heel. He
could claim credit for pouring the pi** out of the boot then feign outrage when
it’s discovered that there is still pi** in the boot: “There’s still pi** in
that boot I poured the pi** out of?!! I
didn’t know anything about that! I read
about it in the paper. I am mad as hell that
the pi** I poured out of the boot is still in the boot.”
As a
result of King SFB’s lawlessness 100s of law suits pertaining to rules issued
by the illegal board will be forthcoming.
One pundit claimed that SFB’s decision has “made a mess of labor
law.” Ah, what hasn’t King SFB made a
mess of? Everything SFB touches turns to
the S in SFB.
The only
thing funnier than Breyer’s overstating of the obvious in his ruling is the
conservative reaction to that ruling.
Everyone seems to think this was such a hard slap in the face to King SFB that it will change his lawless behavior. They forget that King SFB is a lawless
punk. He knew at the time what he was
doing was illegal. Conservative pundits’
reaction is befuddling. It’s as if they
believe a legal ruling will somehow change SFB’s criminal activity. He already knows that 90% of what he is doing is illegal.
John
Dillinger robbed banks. He knew it was illegal. Do you think the Supreme Court issuing a 9-0 ruling
asserting that bank robbery was indeed illegal would have changed Dillinger’s
outlook on his crime? “Whoa, hold on
boys we have a 9-0 ruling from the Supreme Court on bank robbery. This changes everything.”
In this regard Dillinger and King SFB are peas in a pod or should we say punks from the same gang. In that sense they know they are breaking the law when they do it. Someone new telling them that what they are doing is against the law will make no difference. It’s not as if either would be inclined to wake up one morning and say, “Holy crap boys, did you guys know that what we’ve been doing is illegal? I just read about it in the papers. I didn’t know a thing about this. Now I’m mad as hell about it. We’d better straighten up, pronto!” Ha.
No comments:
Post a Comment