Note: It's another chemo week so hopefully I'll see you back here Friday. We'll see.
After being slammed with a 250 million dollar law suit, the Caligula, D.C. Compost is back peddling on its Nick Sandman reportage. Last week the Compost issued a half-hearted non-apology apology for its BS coverage of the Sandman story.
After being slammed with a 250 million dollar law suit, the Caligula, D.C. Compost is back peddling on its Nick Sandman reportage. Last week the Compost issued a half-hearted non-apology apology for its BS coverage of the Sandman story.
Sandman is having none of it. As a result, the Caligula, D.C. Compost may
soon become the Covington Post. The
trial is going to be magnificent. Can
Sandman subpoena Big Chief Liar Face (no not that one) Nate Phillips? It would be worth a $50 pay per view to see
that piece of human debris laid to waste on the witness stand by Sandman's lawyer. I wonder what
the over under on the number of lies that POS would have to admit under withering questioning by a good lawyer (supposing there is such a thing) while under oath
would be.
I don’t think that the Compost is going to want
to defend its clearly false reporting when confronted with an hour of tape
proving their reporters are full of crapola.
The tape will be the most dissected piece of tape since the Zapruder
film. It’ll be interesting to watch frame
by frame of the tape trying to being explained away by Compost reporters and
editors. “Mr. Reporter this is frame 10,027. Do we still see Mr. Phillips advancing on Mr.
Sandman as in the previous 10,026 frames?” “Uh, yes we do.” “Okay, Mr. Reporter this frame 10,028. Do we still see Mr. Phillips advancing on Mr.
Sandman?” and it goes on for another 20,000
frames.
Combine the damning video with the despicable
azzbag Philips and my guess is that the Compost will make a very generous offer
to Mr. Sandman to avoid a trial where they be shown to be total azzbag Dope
water carriers. Make them bleed Nick.
Today’s JG rant
Re Stephanie Terry’s letter “Tax hike would aid anti-smoking effort” of Mar 3, 2019
Re Stephanie Terry’s letter “Tax hike would aid anti-smoking effort” of Mar 3, 2019
If everything in Ms. Terry’s letter is true we
ought to be talking about banning cigarettes not taxing them. Smoking causes (contributes is probably a
more accurate word) nearly 500,000 deaths a year. That’s nuts.
Ban it.
Then we can work on banning alcohol. Alchohol contributes to deaths of over 88,000
Americans every year.
Then we can work on banning cars. Cars contribute to the deaths of over 40,000 Americans
every year.
Then we can work on banning ice skating. Ice skating contributes to the deaths of
hundreds of Americans every year.
There are literally 10,000 ways to die. Instead of taxing them to cover the cost of
individual life choices we ought to rely on the life and health care markets to
set premiums to cover the costs of those questionable choices.
What’s dangerous is for the government to tax what
the government considers to be bad choices or worse for government funded “universal
healthcare” to pay the consequences of those life choices. That will allow government to tell you no
smoking, no red meat, no cars that can accelerate to over 55 mph, no guns, no anything
the government deems is bad for you. That sounds a bit like freedom sucking socialism to me.
I say smoke ‘em if you got ‘em, but pay for
your own damn healthcare.
Tax hike would aid
anti-smoking effort
Historically, Delta
Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. has lobbied for continued research and increased
spending to address health disparities in minority communities and support for
health and wellness programs for the African-American community. The sorority also
supports the Raise It For Health Campaign and encourages the General Assembly
to increase the cigarette tax.
According to the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
African-Americans usually smoke fewer cigarettes and start smoking at an older
age, but they are more likely to die from smoking-related diseases than whites.
African- Americans also attempt to quit more than other populations, but are
less likely to be successful. This is possibly due to lower utilization of
cessation programs and effective prevention messages.
Smoking costs the
state more than $7.6 billion a year in health care expenses, productivity
losses and premature death. Tobacco prevention and cessation experts agree that
raising the cost of cigarettes will significantly reduce smoking and generate
the needed revenue to implement intervention programs to address drug addiction
and infant mortality.
Research also
demonstrates that community support and involvement are necessary to
implement effective tobacco prevention and cessation. This is an
opportunity to bring back interventions such as Not In Mama's House, a
culturally tailored program to educate on the deadly consequences of secondhand
smoke. The increase in funds would help position Indiana as a leader of
innovative public health policy.
The Indiana chapters
support closing the health disparity gap as well as improving health outcomes
for all Hoosiers. This starts with a common-sense cigarette tax and
comprehensive tobacco control programs. Let's take a stand and support reducing
smoking in our state.
Stephanie Terry
Indiana state
coordinator, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment