I must give Jacqueline St. John's
letter (Aug. 10) a big fat cheers for smoking out so many self-loathing virtue
signaling well-heeled white letter writers lamenting the fate of African - Americans
and “people of color” – a racist term is ever there was one.
Many take on the characteristics of Stephanie O’Shaughnessy’s
letter, “Privilege exists even if it’s not acknowledged” of August 18, 2019 where
writers bemoan blatant racism. Then,
like O’Shaughnessy, they don’t tell us what they are doing to level the playing
field, rather they point their woke self-righteous boney fingers at “you” and
demand that “you” do something about it.
Here are the undeniable truths:
Racism exists in America and has largely been
the sole province of the Democratic Party since the 1860s (Slavery, founding of
the KKK, opposing Reconstruction, Jim Crow, Segregation, etc. is the platform
upon which today’s Democratic Party rests).
With blatant flaming racists and anti-Semites
like Talib, Omar, Jackson, Sharpton, Wright, AntiFa etc. at its forefront, the Democratic
Party remains America’s safe space for raging racists.
Democrats enacted welfare rules that chased
African – American males out of their homes and away from their children forcing
families into generational reliance on the bare subsistence provided by the government
and Democrats labeled it “compassion”.
For 60 years now, Democrats have promoted the
use of troublesome hyphenated Americans and government “affirmative action”
programs to promote division. We’re 60
years on now, and there is no end in sight.
Now consider this: how is it possible for
Asians and immigrants from the sub-continent to come to America and thrive within
a generation while Democrat wards of the state, African – Americans, remain mired
in Democrat controlled urban hell holes for 60 years?
And this:
PDJT has done more for African – Americans in two years with Opportunity
Zones, criminal justice reform and record low unemployment than the entirety of
the Democratic Party has done in 60 years.
What has it gotten him? An avalanche
of lies and projection from the Democratic Party labeling him a racist. Pathetic.
Privilege exists even if it's not acknowledged
In response to Jacqueline St. John's letter (Aug. 10) on the
past dragging down the present. Racism didn't end when slavery was abolished.
It didn't end when the Civil Rights Act established equal voting rights or when
Brown v. Board of Education desegregated schools. Racism is prevalent today
when black people are more frequently stopped by police. Given harsher
sentences for the same crimes white people commit. When students of color are
reprimanded more in schools and given harsher punishments than white students –
often preventing them from receiving the education to succeed in life.
Racism exists in the daily microaggressions of rude service,
fewer tips, and nurses and doctors disbelieving of black people's pain. Racism
exists when real estate agents only show houses in “that” part of town to
black and brown people.
You may not have participated in any of the above actions, but
have you benefited from them? Has your family been able to accumulate wealth
because they were able to receive a quality education, get a decent job, buy
property? Have you witnessed any of the above and called out the discrimination
in any way?
If not, then you've benefited from simply being white. You
didn't ask for this privilege, but not understanding it or having a willingness
to confront it does keep this country from moving forward. Read books and
articles (there are so many wonderful ones) on how to dismantle the systemic
racism established by our ancestors. That's the only way for this country to
reach its true greatness.
Stephanie O'Shaughnessy
Fort Wayne
Racial discrimination a staining legacy
Jacqueline St. John's letter of Aug. 10 lamented how much
attention has been placed on the phenomena of white privilege and racism. She
argued that such complaints come “straight out of the 1960s” and that there is
“very little still relevant today.”
William Faulkner's well-worn wisdom is useful here: “The past is
never dead. It's not even past.” Racial discrimination has a long legacy that
shapes our nation still today. After World War II, notorious “housing
covenants” denied black veterans the same opportunity as white veterans to use
their GI Bill benefits to buy family homes in the suburbs. This still affects
black families today, who struggle to accrue the financial stability their
white counterparts achieved by investing in lucrative suburban housing more
than half a century ago.
The “war on drugs” that began in the 1970s and grew into a
“tough on crime” movement by the 1990s resulted in millions of people going to
jail. By 1999, 74% of all Americans going to jail on drug offenses were black.
This is not because black people were responsible for 74% of drug use; it is
because the police and judicial system enforced laws against blacks more
vigorously than against whites. As professor Michelle Alexander explained in
“The New Jim Crow” (2010), this has led to African American communities
struggling to achieve economic and social advancement.
Most white folks, and I am one, don't spend much time in black
communities and, as a result, lack an intuitive understanding of the legacy of
racism. To be sure, the legacy exists. The activists today raising issues of
white privilege and racism follow a proud and honorable American tradition that
goes back hundreds of years. Their America is your America, and it is a nation
that has long wrestled with racial discrimination and its legacy.
David G. Schuster
Fort Wayne
JG editors and Libs living in Fantasyland
Re: John Boerger’s letter “Meaningful action on guns long overdue”
of Aug 18, 2019
Content to publish what is essentially the same
letter over a different name, the JG turns to Boerger to recycle the same lies
about and Fantasyland solutions to gun violence in America.
The first big lie is that gun violence is exclusive
to America. It is not. When adjusted for population, America is not
in the top of nations with most deaths as a result of mass shootings. Nor is it in the top ten of nations in
frequency of mass shootings.
Next are the Fantasyland solutions like Australian style
gun buybacks. First and most importantly,
what Boerger doesn’t mention is that Australian “buyback” was mandatory. In plain English, it was gun confiscation orchestrated
by the government.
Consider the scale of the problem. Australia managed to confiscate somewhere between
650,000 to million weapons. Roughly half of the American population – about 155
million people – own roughly 310 million guns.
When the very deep blue states of New York and Connecticut
instituted “mandatory” registration and bans on certain types of magazines, compliance
among leftists who populate those states and supposedly support this kind of nonsense
was tepid at best. So how does Boerger
suppose a gun confiscation scheme will play out in red stares? My guess is civil war.
But, being a veteran, I’m sure Boerger will be willing
to ruck up move out and draw fire as he goes door to door to confiscate his
neighbor’s guns by force. Nhaa. Whining lefties
will be hiding under the bedsheets wetting themselves while demanding the government
“do something.”
Boerger notes, falsely, that Australia, Russia, all of Europe, Canada and Asia none of these “have
the gun violence like in the USA.” Actually,
what none of these countries have is a constitution like the United States.
If the left wants to avoid civil unrest what they
need to do is propose a repeal and replacement for the Second Amendment and put
it to a vote. The left claims Americans
are demanding “common sense gun control.”
Put it out there. Let’s vote.
Meaningful action on guns long overdue
We fly the flag at half staff, we offer thoughts, we offer
prayers, we watch our politicians visit the wounded and offer sympathy for the
dead. Symbols, yes. Meaningful, no!
Symbols can have meaning if they are supported by or
have a history of action, such as legislation that addresses mass murders,
domestic terrorism and violence. But since Columbine, Sandy Hook, etc., there
has been no action to address our culture of guns.
A recent report suggested we would study where effective
measures were in place to counter gun violence. That has already been
done – in Australia, Russia, all of Europe, Canada and Asia. None of
these have gun violence like the USA. Why? Perhaps because guns are not as
readily available.
The USA is not significantly different from other
countries in mental health issues; all have similar access to the internet and
violent gaming; conservative, liberal and radical influencers are throughout
the world and easily found. What is different is the accessibility of guns in
the USA.
I am a veteran and I respect and admire the Constitution of the
United States, but I think we have either misinterpreted the Second
Amendment or our founders just got it wrong on this single point.
We are tired of thoughts and prayers, half-staff flags and
hollow political symbols. We are long overdue for meaningful action.
John Boerger
Fort Wayne
1 comment:
O'Shaughnessy and Shyster should support the president. Help grow the economy and jobs for all. But I suspect they won't. Support nuke and hydro power which create no CO2? I doubt they would support it. Brookings projects America will be 51 percent minorities by the year 2044. No doubt the problems will be solved by then. All unicorns and rainbows. As long as America is a capitalist country individuals will compete and competition is mostly good. If it was not competitive Lex would be playing QB for the Chicago Bears.
Post a Comment