Disgraced FBI agent Pete Strzok has been canned. It’s about time, but it exposes more
corruption within the FBI. The FBI
Office of Profession Responsibility recommended that the crooked, lying former FBI
d-bag receive only a 6 month suspension and a demotion.
Whoever investigates the FBI OPR needs to get started. If Strzok’s long history of open and brazen sleaziness
isn’t enough to recommend a dismissal wtf is?
The left, ever faithful to their d-bag deep state army that has been
exposed trying to subvert an American election, are actually saying that there
is no proof that Strzok ever let his clear bias influence his investigations. YGBSM!
Whatever happened to the “even the appearance of bias” rule being the
death knell for anyone involved in a criminal investigation?
But it is just plain BS. Strzok is the d-bag who recommend changing “grossly
negligent” to “extremely careless” letting crooked Shrillda the Hutt off the
legal hook. Strzok is also the d-bag who
pushed the baloney Russian dossier against PDJT’s campaign and later his
administration.
Strzok was the lead FBI agent who, rather than inform the Trump campaign
of the made up Russian connections of two Trump associates, like they did for
the 187 year old DiFi when she had a ChiCom spy working in her office for 20 F-ing
years while her old man raked in millions and millions of dollars from the Chicoms,
he tried to bait the two into committing crimes of associating with Russians.
Strzok and the ever increasing line of FBI and DOJ top level scum involved in trying
to fix the 2016 Presidential Election are criminals. They should be jailed. It remains my contention that their
treasonous actions will go totally unpunished.
The deep state cannot start sending deep state operatives to jail,
because, if they did, nobody knows where that will end.
My guess is that it ends right at The Empty Suit’s door.
Today’s JG rant
Re Thom Bauer et al letters bemoaning Jim Banks’s response to Courtney
Tritch’s demand for a long series of debates
The left, as expressed by the letters found on the JG ed page, is, as always,
melting down. The issue du jour for the perennially
outraged is Jim Banks’s response to Courtney Tritch’s demand for an endless
series of debates.
Jim Banks should absolutely debate Courtney Tritch. Doing so will allow him to reach the 1/10,000th
of 1% of 3rd District voters who – like Bauer - have no idea what
Banks’s “policy for the district” is and haven’t yet heard about AlGore’s
wonder invention – the interweb – where if you type “Jim Banks” into the search
engine you’ll get over 10,000,000 results.
Deciding who to vote for in the 3rd District congressional race
isn’t a complicated problem like trying to unravel the mysteries of dark
matter. It’s actually no more
complicated than solving for 2+2 and does not require even one debate.
Banks favors securing the border. Tritch will go along with Nancy Pelosi’s
and Maxine Waters’ demand for open borders, which will increase crime and
welfare dependency while suppressing working family’s wages.
Banks favors low taxes. Tritch
will be Pelosi’s sock puppet in favor of clawing back your “crumby” tax break
in addition to grabbing an extra slice of your family’s economic pie.
Jim Banks favors a strong national defense. Tritch will favor depleting military expenditures
and readiness to whatever degree Nancy Pelosi tells her to.
Jim Banks favors economic strength through individual responsibility. Tritch
will favor economic disaster by punishing achievers and redistributing their
wealth in elaborate vote buying schemes using your tax dollars – which is the Democrat/Socialist
way.
Jim Banks understands the 27 plain words of the Second Amendment. Tritch does not have a clue.
Jim Banks will vote for America first.
I’m not saying Tritch and other Democrats are anti-American. It’s just hard for me to see how their
policies and rhetoric would be any different if they were.
So debate if you must, but the choice is already clear.
Belittling statement
reveals Banks as afraid
Recently I received an
e-mail from the Courtney Tritch campaign concerning debates between her and our
supposed congressman. It seems Jim Banks has decided he is too busy
raising a family, among various other reasons he couldn't or wouldn't debate. I
guess he would prefer to infer that Tritch has more time than he since she is
single with no husband and no children. Isn't this the most stupid excuse we
have ever heard?
I cannot understand
why anyone in our 3rd District would accept this as viable behavior for our
congressman.
Banks has had maybe
two town halls in Fort Wayne, so how would we possibly know what his policy is
for the district? He seems to say he is a fiscal conservative but turned around
and voted for the outrageous tax reform, giving the biggest breaks to the rich
and hiking the deficit even more. He buys a house in Washington, D.C., and
lives in a very nice home in Columbia City. Another do as I say not as I do
syndrome. While I have nothing against having nice things and doing what is
best for your family, wouldn't it have been better to maybe give the money
for the Washington, D.C., home to charity or veterans benefits, which he
constantly touts as his greatest asset?
I call on Banks to
debate Courtney Tritch so we know exactly what his plans are going
forward and why we should vote for him. Or is it that he
is afraid to show he has absolutely no ability to face off? If
this continues, why would we vote for this individual?
Thom Bauer
Fort Wayne
No comments:
Post a Comment