Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Question of the day: How many of the 19 will target criminals?

LB rolls out his 19 gun grabbing executive orders today. It’ll be interesting to see how many of them will make a criminal’s life tougher and how many will be extra-constitutional pre-crime type harassment and infringements on law abiding citizens.


I’m not sure I can even come up with 19 gun laws above and beyond the 100s already on books, but here’s a start:

Commit a crime, any crime, with any type of firearm gets that criminal a 10 year mandatory federal sentence.

Stealing any type of firearm gets that thief a 10 year mandatory federal sentence.

Transferring any type of firearm to a known felon gets the person transferring the firearm a mandatory 10 year federal sentence.

Any felon in possession of any type of firearm gets the felon a 10 year mandatory federal sentence.

That’s a start. Notice the emphasis is on criminals and criminal acts. Lex is not in the business of restricting the rights of law abiding citizens because they might commit a crime. Neither is it appropriate to bastardize our constitution because of the actions of criminals and a few nut jobs.

Demo-Dopes don’t want to go after criminals and nut jobs because they are natural constituents of the Dope Party.

In the aftermath of one of the most famous self defense shooting in years where a GA woman protected herself and her children in an attic crawlspace from a home intruder by shooting the Piece-O-$h!t FIVE TIMES, Demo-Dope Jerry Nadler proclaimed “one or two shots should be enough” for self defense. The POS in the case above, long-time trouble maker Paul Slater, survived the FIVE SHOTS and was able to leave the house, start and drive his car into a tree. So, Jerry, was it the first one or two shots that deterred Slater or the last three? I’m sure the GA woman and her children are happy not to have to know the answer to that question.

The fact that Slater was able to drive away indicates one of three things: 1) The woman needs to get to the range more often. 2) She needs a larger caliber handgun. 3) She needs a handgun that holds more than five rounds.

I don’t know what LB and his @$$wipe VP are going to come up with, but my initial response is, “I will not comply.”

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

The NY governor just threw gun mag manufacturers a bone. I don't think I have seen a 7 shot mag. It means a new product for the people that make gun mags. Next year NY will institute a new law requiring a 6 shot mag, and so on. A new NY gun restriction bans rifles with a handgrip. Finally! Well, these dolts pols are going to get the new product labs for gun mfg busy. Let's call it the Gun Klunker Program, based the car program called Cash for Klunkers. The Griffin.

Anonymous said...

I must be missing something. Article II, Section 1, Clause 1, of the Constitution of the United States clearly states that the President is vested with the power, "to execute the instructions of Congress, which has THE EXCLUSIVE POWER TO MAKE LAWS."

Article II, Section 1, further states the President can enter on the Execution of his Office, he must take the following Oath or Affirmation:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) taht I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Seems pretty obvious that Executive Orders issued that would suggest that the statement in Amendment II, "shall not be infringed", need not be protected, would be a violation of that Oath.

Isn't that grounds to impeach the dip$h!t?

Infidel