Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Little Barry's mass murdering administration

Remember when Richard the dick Armitage outted the bad Joe Wilson’s wife Valerie Plame as a person who drove through the front gate at Langley – aka an employee of the CIA? How many people died in that episode? Oh, nearly one. Yeah, exactly nobody.


Yet the left went through the roof and a prosecutor was assigned. Even though special prosecutor Patty Fitzgerald broke the case in the first week by IDing the dick Armitage as the perpetrator of the uh, em, “crime” the investigation dragged on for over two years.

The “investigation” resulted in the perp, the dick Armitage, of the supposed crime of outing an already open employee of the CIA Plame walking with no real consequences. Meanwhile, Lewis scooter Libby got sent up the river for obstructing an investigation where the investigators knew who the perp was BEFORE there was any obstruction. Miscarriages of justice such as this are why we all need to keep our guns. If they can send a powerful guy like Libby up the river for “obstructing” a case that had been solved before his first interview, do you really think that they will not be able to find something on you, if you get in their way?

OK now fast forward to today where Diane Feinstein has indicated that there is a security leak in the White House that has damaged national security and resulted in the “loss of assets.” Hmm, I wonder what that means. What do we get - a big yawn from the left and the MSM. Couple these national security leaks with the Fast and Furious debacle and this administration is responsible for more deaths than the movie shooter, Columbine shooters, Ft. Hood shooter, Tucson shooter and VaTech shooter combined. As such, wouldn’t be more practical for congress to concern itself with prosecuting Justice Dept, ATF officials and White House leakers than assaulting the Second Amendment of the US Constitution…again?

RepubliRat Sissyboys
You can always count on “conservatives” to start shooting one another over one issue or another in the completely hopeless effort to make themselves appear reasonable to leftie loons in the MSM. Take Mitt Romney’s tax returns. Who really gives a crap? DemoDopes. That’s it. If he releases 12 years, they’ll want 15. If he releases 15, they’ll want 20. The only reason they want the returns is to dig up crap that can be twisted into 100’s of 30 second spots in FL, OH and PA. That’s it.

They have no other interest in what is in those returns. You can bet they will not be dwelling on Romney’s 10’s of thousands of dollars to charity compared to Slow Joe’s annual $200 contribution. You can bet they won’t dwell on the fact that Romney didn’t take a dime in salary from the state while serving as Governor. You can bet they won’t sing him great praise for squaring away the Winter Olympics for free.

So what do expect from “loyal conservatives”? Here’s what we expect. “Go to hell! Yeah, as soon as Little pass through Barry releases his college transcripts, we’ll release more tax returns.” How great would that be?

But what we get is chorus of “even-handed,” “open-minded,” “reasonable” cowardly RepubliRats calling for Romney to do what the Dopes are demanding. Just go ahead and release the returns and be done with it. All manner of weak kneed RepbliRat from the editors at National Review to former RNC Chair Michael Steel seem to think it’s a good strategy to cave to the Dopes on every inane issue they raise. That’s how we got into this mess. Too few RepubliRats are willing to fight the good fight.

Now look what the “Rats” are doing to Michelle Bachman. She asks a simple question to the scumbags at the State Dept – Was Huma Abidin properly vetted for her job at State given her family’s close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Perfectly reasonable to me. But not to weak Rats, like John McCain and John Boehner who are demanding that Bachmann apologize for asking a legitimate question. Why is it that Republican women seem to have more manly virtue than most RepubliRat men? No doubt these Rat men would have left their dates to fend for themselves in that movie theater or worse would have expected the women to protect them.

Why not take the same approach to Bachmann’s reasonable question as they do to the Dope’s unreasonable demands for Romney’s tax returns? Just answer the question and be done with it. Effemall.

No comments: