Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Supremes and gay marriage

The Dopes in Robes are deciding a case on gay marriage. If the Dopes rule in favor of allowing gays to claim they are “married,” the whole country will be set on its head.


Here’s why. Marriage is a word that for 2,000 years has meant one thing. With a whimsical decision, the Supremes will put themselves in the business of redefining the English language.

If little Johnny shows up to school one day and demands to be called a tiger, who can tell him, “No Johnny. You’re a little boy”? Well the Supremes could then decide that there’s no harm in letting people call things whatever they want as long as they’re in love with someone or something. If Little Johnny says he’s a tiger and wants to insist he rides the beer truck to school, well no one can tell him any different or they’ll be racists.

So when a hysterical lady calls 9-1-1 screaming a tiger just got hit by a beer truck the inevitable confusion that reigns on that phone call may just cost the tiger his life.

You don’t believe Lex? Well ask Prince, or the artist formerly known as Prince, or what he has been referred to as on some radio stations, “unpronounceable symbol.” Stupid decisions sometimes have dire consequences. The Tower of Babble comes to mind. The consequences of the Price debacle required Price to go back to being Prince.

Next, love cannot be the only criteria for calling something a marriage. If the Supreme Dopes think marriage can be between a man and a man because they love each other, who is to say a guy who loves his dog shouldn’t be able to marry it and enjoy all of the social advantages of a married couple?

Isn’t it a human condition that we are capable of loving more than one person? Then what narrow minded bastard would deny three or four people who love each other the right to marry all of them? And how narrow minded is it that we don’t let 30 something men marry two or three 12-13 year old girls.

These things never end in a logical place, because once you’ve escaped the bounds of logic in the first instance, there is no logical conclusion. Look at the welfare state. It started with feeding, clothing and housing the poor. Now there are free iphones, free college, free everything to the point that a capable scammer can make 40K on government “benefits.” 40K on assistance or take a job paying 42K? Sit on your @$$ for 40K or bust your @$$ for lousy 2K extra?

Last, and this is key, the coming assault will be on anyone who doesn’t get in line with the abomination. You may not hate anyone, or even give a flying crap what they do in the privacy of their home, but you’d better get in line with gay marriage or you’ll be labeled a hater.

If you even attend a church that doesn’t perform gay marriages, you’re screwed irrespective of what the Bible says. You are a hater. Religious beliefs are no shield. Ridicule, scorn and mocking will be heaped upon you until you just stop going to church and begin denying your beliefs. And you certainly won’t want any of your off spring subjected the abuse, so you’ll keep them away as well. Churches are the next target of this BS.

Now if you attend a mosque, your open hatred of women, gays, Christians, Jews, and everyone who refuses to return to the 12th century, will be celebrated as diversity.

Most of us don’t hate anyone. We just want to be left alone to live our lives and peacefully associate with the people we chose to. The left will have none that. It’s all diversity all of the time, unless of course, you’re actually diverse enough to disagree with them on something, then all hell will descend upon you.

Diversity is BS to the left. They demand sameness in everything.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

All over the news I hear that polling is showing that the country has moved to allow gay marriages. I also see that polling shows that Obamcare is now and continues to be unfavorable. So going with that logic I propose the Supreme Court rule to end Obamacare. Then off to spring break!
The Griffin.