A bad deal and assessing JFK

Iranian Deal
Of course it’s a bad deal.  I have a theory.  Anytime the phone rings after 9pm, it’s bad news.  King SFB took to the airwaves after 10 pm EST, on a Saturday no less, to announce this turd.  So it has to be bad news.  But King Jugears and his minister of mischief, Cambodian war hero Lord Horseface, wanted the news out before the Sunday talk shows so as to distract the kingdom’s subjects from the fiasco that is the king’s signature piece of $h!t, uh, make that legislation - Robertscare.

When thinkers as disparate as the Israelis, the Saudis, Alan Dershowitz and the king’s chief azz kissing jester Lord Chuckels the Schumer are all suspicious, then there must be something to be suspicious of.

JFK Rewind
Quick, what date did George Washington die?  (Dec 14, 1799)  What date did Lincoln die? (Apr 15, 1865)  Before we adopted the “let’s give all of the president’s a trophy” mentality (i.e. President’s Day), we used to celebrate these two great American’s birthdays in Feb on the 22nd and 12th respectively, but who recalls the date of their deaths?

So why the fascination with the death date of JFK?  I think it’s because it serves the purpose the lapdog media.  On Nov 22^nd every year, Dopes and leftists try to white wash the murder of one their own by one of their own.  First, JFK was shot by an avowed communist – Lee Harvey Oswald.  All the media harping on conservative Dallas is not going to change the fact that JFK was shot by a Godless commie bastard – one of the Dopes own if you will – Lee Harvey Oswald.  The fact that half the country did not care for JFK does not change the fact that a commie loving SOB – Lee Harvey Oswald – shot him.  Tom Browkow and other lefty ignoramuses can engage in revisionist history from now until the day the sun don’t shine, but it will not change the fact that JFK was shot by, as Jackie O herself put it, some “little communist” – Lee Harvey Oswald.

Next, there needs to be a conspiracy theory because Dopes cannot accept the fact that JFK was shot in his prime by a little commie sympathizer – Lee Harvey Oswald.  There has to be some big business, mob or conservatives connection of some type to square this circle for deranged lefties.  That is the same crowd that is still counting votes in FL from the 2000 election by the way.  In their deranged minds, JFK could not have been gunned down by a lone commie ideologue – Lee Harvey Oswald.  The Dope logic goes, conservatives hated JFK so much, they conspired with a commie – Lee Harvey Oswald – to shoot him.  Riiiiiiiiiiight.

Also, how does the left completely ignore the fact that JFK would be about as welcome in today’s Dope Party as Ted Cruz.  At the time of his death, Kenney was a pro-life, tax cutting, anti-communist cold warrior who believed in American exceptionalism to the extent that he inspired a nation to send men to the moon.   How do those ideals fit into today’s kill the babies, screw our allies while praising our enemies, tax America to death because America sucks Demo-Dope Party?  The lefties cannot stand when Rush Limbaugh or other conservatives use Kennedy’s own words to point out just how afar today’s Dope Party has drifted from the ideological moorings of one of their professed icons.

Next the left’s contention that America was Camelot under the Kennedys is hogwash.  I don’t recall the scene in Camelot where Robert Goulet was teaching the children to duck and cover under their school desks to avoid being turned to cinder in a flash.  In the left’s mind, or the vacuum that occupies the space where their minds are supposed to be, America being the closest it has ever been to vaporization is in fact Camelot, as long as it’s one their guys sitting in the Oval Office when the mushroom cloud appears over it.  To their way of thinking, Camelot, no matter how dystopian, is still Camelot.

There is an “eternal flame” at Kennedy’s grave in Arlington.  Count me in the minority that thinks that is way over the top vanity on the part of the Kennedy’s.  Neither Washington nor Lincoln has an “eternal flame.”  Their contributions to making our country great far exceed those of Kennedy.  Yet Kennedy has the flame.

Millions have come to Arlington and seen it.  How many left thinking, “Well he’s the only one with an ‘eternal flame,’ so he must be the best.’”  But once lit, who is gong to be the one who says, “OK now that we’ve had time to get a grip, let’s rethink this ‘eternal flame’ thing.’”

And not to be too crass or petty, who is paying the gas bill for that thing?  I think it’d be a good thing if we waited at least 50 years after a pol’s death before lighting an “eternal flame,” placing their image on our money or naming anything other than a public outhouse after them.

UPDATE:  Has anyone considered the ecological damage being done by a hydrocarbon fueled "eternal flame"?  Maybe it's time the flame were swapped out for a 40 watt eternal compact florescent light bulb powered by a Solyndra solar panel. 

Oh, and not to be too crass a second time, if America was indeed Camelot under the Kennedys, who was Lady Guinevere, Marilyn Monroe or Judith Exner?