Friday, September 22, 2017

Half the country is stark raving mad part II

Well-known healthcare expert Jimmy Kimmel has railed against the latest Republican effort to repeal Robertscare.  He went so far as to call one of the senators sponsoring the bill a liar. The senator, Bill Cassidy, is a member of the Caligula, D.C. ruling class, so his being a liar is not beyond the realm of possibility.

But hey Jimmy, what’s alternative?  Robertscare is crashing and burning faster than Sean Spicer’s appearance at the Emmys.  Doing nothing is probably not a good option. 

How the hell did Jimmy Kimmel become an expert on healthcare?  He’s a late night TV funny man humorist comedian jokester hmm...ahh, TV host.  Well, the short answer is, he isn’t.  He had a child born with a heart defect.  He claimed had he been Jimmy Nobody, without Robertscare, the hospital would have kicked him and his sick son to the curb and let the child die.  BS.  I’m pretty sure there are already laws in place to prevent such actions.

But that is the sole basis for Kimmel’s “expertise,” a sick child.  I have been blind in one eye on more than one occasion.  Does that make me an expert on blindness?  Am I an expert on the procedure that restored my vision?  No, apparently not.  Not one newsman has contacted me to get my “expert opinion” on Graham Cassidy. Kimmel’s just a loud mouth Lefty lib with a platform to tell joke someone else wrote that doesn’t know any more about anything than the average guy riding the subway.

Kimmel’s unhingededness went on to threaten Fox News host Brian Kilmeade with physical violence.  Didn’t they have celebrity boxing at one time?  I think I recall Donny Bonaduce and that skater gal Tanya Harding squaring off.  Hmm, on second thought maybe they had different opponents, but then again maybe not.  Idunno.

Anyhoo, several posts under Lex proposes bring back dueling.  I thought that John Kelly putting a bullet through Louis Gutierrez’s empty head would be a good thing.  No one would get hurt, but it would send a strong message that slander would not be tolerated.      

So Kilmeade needs to respond to Kimmel – boxing gloves or pistols at dawn, your choice.

Oh, and if haven't seen Lefty Lib unhingededness, check out PMSNBC's lying Larry O'Donnell come unglued.


Funny UPDATE:
I wrote this letter that appeared in the JG in the Sunday edition:

Since about 9pm on November 8, 2016, America’s left has been spiraling out of control.  Their deranged response to the democratically elected 45th President of the United States has been like an unending reality show.  It has been one outrageous over the top reaction after another.

As the derangement of lefty libs intensifies, with the exception of the disgusting violence of the George Soros funded Democrat goon army, known as Antifa, the show has been somewhat entertaining. It’s been like watching Wile E. Coyote trying catch the Road Runner.

One of the newer attacks on PDJT is that he’s mentally unstable, a narcissist.  Okay fine.  PDJT is a narcissist. 

Sadly, presidential elections are largely binary choices.  In 2016 we had a choice between Trump the narcissist and Clinton the sociopathic liar.  The narcissist won.  Get over it.   

Sociopaths are the Burger King kids who want it their way and they want it NOW.  To get what they want, they will tell the most outrageous lies imaginable.  They will crush anyone who gets in their way.  They lack morals.  They NEVER accept responsibility for lies gone wrong or apologize. 

Here’s Hillary’s quick list in no particular order: 
Whitewater; Benghazi; cattle futures; uranium; travel office firings; private E-mail server; “missing” Rose Law Firm billing records; 33,000 deleted emails; rape enabler; sniper fire; looting of the White House and Air Force one on the way out of office; Clinton Foundation slush fund; character assassin of husband Bill’s victims 

With the exception of marrying well, she has accomplished nothing on her own.  She has the ironic honor of being a well-known feminist ONLY because of the man she married.  She has been able to force herself on the American political scene for the last 25 years only because she married well.  Were it not for Bill, Hillary would be third rate lawyer at second rate law firm somewhere.

In response some chick, Nancy Bryan, wrote:

Regarding the letter in your Sept. 17 issue (“After marrying well, what has Clinton done?”), Doug Schumick needs simply to check Wikipedia before stating so many inaccuracies regarding Hillary Clinton. Like her or not, you cannot dismiss her accomplishments. She was the first student commencement speaker at Wellesley College and received a seven-minute standing ovation. She received her law degree from Yale University. She advocated for children's rights since the early '70s. During her postgraduate studies, she served as staff attorney for the newly founded Children's Defense Fund. In 1974, after being highly recommended, she became a member of the impeachment inquiry staff advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal. Then she married Bill Clinton. Do I really have to go on?
Nancy Bryan
Angola

To me, this is hilarious.  It’s like calling your boss an over-weight, incompetent, lying, thieving, no-good, womanizing cheat, a dope-smoking, cocaine-snorting, drunk, with bad breath, a terrible toupee, and a horrible fashion sense and his response being, “Hey, I resent that. I’ve got a sense for fashion.”

I called Shrillda the Hutt, among many other things, a “rape enabler” and Ms. Bryan responds with, “Hey she gave the commencement speech at Wellesley.”  YGBSM.  That’s it? That’s like Chris Rock commenting on white people having the N-word and blacks coming back by calling whites crackers*.  Really? Cracker? That’s all you've got? 

*NOTE:  Should the inherently racist saltine “crackers” and Animal “crackers” be removed from store shelves?  I think so.

She talks about Shrillda the Hutt’s work during the Watergate scandal without mentioning the Hutt got her broad azz fired from that gig for being incompetent.  It’s just too damn easy with these people.

I also love Ms. Bryan’s Wikipedia reference.  It reminds of the Michael Scott quote from The Office, “Wikipedia is great because anyone can get on there and post anything about everything anytime they want.”

Ms. Bryan asks, “Do I really have to go on?”  Yes Nancy!  Yes you do, until you wander across a significant accomplishment.  But hey, if it’s not on Wikipedia can it really exist?

No comments: