Thursday, September 14, 2017

Everyone is to blame but the one who is responsible

Shrillda the Hutt is on a tear.  She is up to, what, over 100 excuses and people to blame for her bumbling campaign that blew through nearly a billion bucks and still got their azzes whipped like Conor Mcgregor got whipped by Floyd Mayweather by a political novice.

Jimmy the shape shifter Comey has come in for his own share criticism from the Hutt.  The Hutt thinks were it not for Comey’s reopening of her e-mail investigation in Oct. she’d have won.

That’s probably a fair characterization.  Had it not been for the timing of Comey’s reopening of his e-mail investigation, the Hutt might have had the presence of mind to consider visiting, WI or MI or PA or IA.  So sure when you’re worried about an investigation that the investigator has already cleared you of wrong doing because “there was no intent,” you might make dumb mistakes, but they are not your mistakes for sure - they are Comey’s.

The Hutt blaming Comey for her loss is like famed bank robber Willy Sutton blaming his lawlessness on bankers for keeping money in their buildings. The Hutt is an idiot.  Comey didn’t set up the Hutt’s e-mail account.  Comey didn’t lie about the account. Well he did.  But he didn’t lie about it to advance the Hutt’s career.  Okay he did that too.  But Comey wasn’t running for president.  Comey didn’t dump 33,000 e-mails.  Comey wasn’t the arrogant azz that said, “you mean with a cloth” when asked if she wiped the server. 

Sorry Shrillda, well actually I’m not sorry, this whole thing falls right into your lap and nobody else’s.  What happened?  You happened.  You’re arrogance thinking someone else is responsible is stunning, well considering it is coming from you, it is not stunning – it’s pathetic.

This is good time to reintroduce Occcam’s law of parsimony or Occam’s razor.  The gist of that theory is of a list of competing hypothesis for the cause of a problem, say losing the most winnable election in the history of the republic, the theory with the fewest variables – i.e. the simplest answer – is most likely the correct answer.

While the Hutt moves about the country constructing the most elaborate Rube Goldberg machine ever imagined to explain why she was crushed like a bug on Nov. 8th 2016 and takes 500 pages to explain “What Happened,” people with an ounce of common sense can do it in three words: Shrillda the Hutt.

1 comment:

The Griffin said...

A question asked several times during the pres election was to name a Hillary accomplishment. No one could because none exists. The no resume of Obama worked. He beat McCain and Romney. Obama will be forever known as the first black president and an implied victim of racism. He had no accomplishments. Hillary was supposed to win to make up for years of sexism and victimization. But married women voted for Trump. No doubt they were sexist. I will stop here.