Thursday, September 19, 2013

Libs buying up AR-15s before they ban them?

I recall an old bumper sticker that said, “If you want to piss off a liberal, buy a gun.”  That’s good stuff.  Now we can offer a modified sticker, “If you want to REALLY piss off a liberal, buy an AR-15.”

Liberals are obsessed with what they refer to as the black military style assault weapon.  Well, many are black, but if you want to cough up the cash, you can get a pink one for your wife and daughter.  It’s made of matt black plastic because plastic is a heck of a lot easier to maintain, cheaper to produce and modify than a traditional wood stock.  Besides, since gun grabbers and tree huggers are pretty much the same people, shouldn’t they be celebrating the fact that no trees were harmed in the production of AR-15s?

By military style, I suppose they mean it looks like a military weapon.  Yes, perhaps it does.  But that’s were ignorant Libs make a big mistake.  In their ignorance they confuse appearance with functioning.  So when they foolishly pass laws to ban “assault weapons,” they zero in on how the weapon looks rather than how it functions.  So they out law rifles with pistol grips.  That is just plain idiocy.

Many popular hunting rifles, which are much more powerful than an AR-15, function in the exact same manner as an AR.  But ignorant Lib pols cannot be distracted from their unconstitutional gun grabbing ways by facts.  Facts, to a Lib, are like kryptonite to Superman, chlorine to algae or real work to our king.

The term “assault weapon” is the most curious of Lib descriptors of guns whose appearance they don’t care for.  Rifles account for only 3% of the weapons of choice for criminals when committing their crimes. Rifles or long guns, are far less likely to kill you or anyone else in a crime than human fists. Yet nobody is requiring background checks and mandatory wearing of Hulk Hands for people prone to fisticuffs.

Facts make no difference.  Libs remain obsessed with the AR.  So much so they see it everywhere, even in places where it isn’t like the Navy Yard shootings.  The media went on a holy terror telling anyone who would listen that Aaron Alexis had an AR-15.  He didn’t.  Yet Piers Morgan dedicated an entire hour to bemoaning the AR-15.  Which probably had the unintended consequence of boosting sales of the AR.  After all, if ultra Lib gun grabbing Piers is against it, I gotta have one.  Reference paragraph 1. 

Aaron Alexis’ took Slow Joe Biden’s advice when choosing his weapon.  He bought a Remington 870 shotgun.   A shotgun gives a shooter in close quarters a big advantage.  Pistols and AR rifles are very accurate weapons that put a single projectile on the point of aim.  A shotgun disperses many projectiles indiscriminately over an ever increasing pattern.

So if a nut enters a crowded cafeteria and fires three shots from an AR, he’s likely to inflict three casualties.  If the same nut fires three rounds from a shotgun, he’s likely to inflict a dozen or more casualties – depending on the density of the crowd.

So thanks Joe for giving nut jobs good advice on how to inflict the maximum number of casualties on a crowd of people in confined spaces.

If I could justify the purchase for an AR-15, I would buy one just so I could casually mention it in conversation to Libs.  It would be worth every penny to see them shrink away in shock and horror.  But you know, Libs being Libs – that is hypocrites of the highest order – they probably all already own one.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Personally, I'd recommend the AR-10, which is why I have one. Should be much more offensive to the anti-gun crowd than an AR-15. Of course, they probably wouldn't know what it is.

Infidel

Lex E. Libertas said...

I went to the AR web site to check pricing. A little rich for a guy who cannot justify the cost an AR15. Besides EVERY variant was "out of stock." Our king truly is the "best gun salesman ever."