Friday, March 03, 2006

Patriot Act, Dubai port & War help from RATS

Harry, I said I killed it - I didn’t say it was dead, Reid & the Patriot Act
Was that Harry, anyone have a job for my kids, Reid giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to the Patriot Act that he once proudly proclaimed that he’d “killed”? Lead RAT Reid, always the political opportunist putting principal on hold for partisan advantage, moistened his finger, judged the prevailing political wind and actually voted for the bill he once pompously proclaimed to have fatally stabbed in the back. This move puts him in perfect position to win the RAT presidential nomination in ’08 when he can run on the sure winner, “The Patriot Act? I actually voted against before I voted for it.”

Rush has three questions on “port snort”
Rush Limbaugh posed three questions for the RATS on the Dubai port deal:
If our ports are as un-secure as RATS claim, should we be listening in on al Qaeda phone calls for the possibility that they might try to exploit that weakness?
If our ports are as un-secure as RATS claim, should we be interrogating captured al Qaeda terrorists to try to uncover possible plots against our greatest vulnerability?
If our ports are as un-secure as RATS claim, why have RATS opposed the very programs the administration's put into place to protect these facilities?

These questions, of course, expose the RAT’s utter hypocrisy on this issue. Since I support, eavesdropping, G’itmo, “interrogation” of al Qaeda, etc. etc., I am not a hypocrite on the port deal. The only question I have on the Dubai port deal that has not been asked by anyone is: “How much of the profit from this deal is going to find its way back to the very Maddrassas producing the terrorists that we will be killing in ten years?”

RATS unwittingly support war effort
Here’s a counter intuitive thought. The RATS are unwittingly supporting the war effort by opposing it. Here’s the very young logic on this. The RATS and MSM oppose the war and continually compare the US President with Hitler. This gives terrorists hope of defeating the US in Iraq. By continuing their “cause” in Iraq and allowing our military to kill them by the bushel basket load there, the US is denying resources to al Qaeda for use elsewhere.

Where would we be today if every politician in America from the beginning of the war proclaimed loudly and without exception that we will not fail in Iraq, we are in for the long haul, no matter what and that if Iran and Syria give aid and comfort to our enemy we would destroy them? I think the terrorist would long ago have abandoned any hope of prevailing in Iraq and moved on to Africa or somewhere else where we are less able to kill them.

The only flaw in this logic is that the president has noted that while we kill terrorists in Iraq, we don’t have to kill them in New York. Since the president has announced this dynamic, it’s hard for me to believe that RATS would knowingly continue with a policy that actually aides the effort in the war on terror.

No comments: