Thursday, October 11, 2012

Ryan Vs. the repellant Slow Joe

The debate tonight is a real wild card.


First, the controversy over Little Barry being in attendance at the moderator’s weddings is a REAL and obvious concern. I’d expect that the scrutiny that is going to fall on ABC foreign policy correspondent Martha Raddatz for being a Little Barry acolyte will NOT be enough to keep her from going deep into the tank for team Little Barry.

But you have wonder why, for the sake of appearance alone, ABC and the Debate Commission wouldn’t dump Raddatz in favor of another Little Barry acolyte whose lips don’t have such an obvious connection to Little Barry’s @$$.

Raddatz remaining as the debate moderator is the bad news for right-thinking people. The good news is that even with a whole team of Little Barry acolytes moderating the debate, the Dopes will still have to rely on Slow Joe chains Biden and Little Barry’s pee poor record to carry the night. That is a monumental task.

While the Middle East burns, expect Raddatz and Biden to try to direct the debate toward squishy social issues like the “war on women,” helping the poor, taxing the rich, Big Bird, releasing 80 years of tax returns, etc.

When Slow Joe starts lying his @$$ off bout Romney's tax plan, Ryan should respond with:
Joe your characterization of Gov Romney's tax policy is the most inacturate thing you've said since you claimed jobs, J-O-B-S, is a three letter word.

They will have to address Libya in some manner. I’d expect Biden to fall back on some BS line like “we have an investigation on going and we should leave that issue until it is complete,” which of course will be after the election.

There’s a lot of buzz going around about what a “great guy” Slow Joe is. Even Paul Ryan has said he likes the Slowest of all Joes. I don’t. He is a lying, plagiarizing, arrogant buffoon. Ryan ought to remember that it was Slow Joe chains Biden who alluded to a black audience that Romney and Ryan wanted to put them back in chains. He is vile creepy bastard.

For Paul Ryan, as was the case for Romney, I believe the bar is rather low. His task is simply to come off as reasonable, well informed and prepared to be president. He cannot fumble the inevitable “What would you do if, God forbid, something happened to a President Romney,” question. Simple; 1) Pray 2) Call a meeting of leaders on both sides of the aisle 3) Meet the cabinet and military leaders 4) Contact friendly world leaders 5) Address the American people and the world in an evening speech from the Oval Office, but none of that is going to be necessary because as is evidenced by his health record, Mitt Romney is in excellent shape. We really know a lot less about the state of Little Barry’s health.

If he does that while repeating the cost of gas, historic unemployment numbers, welfare numbers, food stamp numbers and the record number of poor under Little Barry, he’ll win big.

He should also negate anything Biden alludes to as what team Little Barry “will do” in second term with a question, “why didn’t you get it done in your first term when you held both houses of congress and the White House?” Case closed. Debate won. If he can do it concisely, with a good nature and a bit of wit, he, like Romney, will win in a landslide.

If it’s not a landslide, the lapdog media will declare Slow Joe the winner.

No comments: