Ass Jerry Rivers confirms he's an ass...again

Well know dumbazz Jerry Rivers (AKA Geraldo Rivera) tweeted this gem:  The Second Amendment, as defined by the NRA, is stupid

Huh?  How does the NRA define the Second Amendment?  Oh, I know:  A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.  That’s brilliant!  27 crystal clear words.  No definition necessary!

The clock-like precision of the anti-2^nd Amendment crowd after a tragedy never surprises me.  It is as if they wait, day in and day out, always at the ready, scanning the Internet for a shooting then recycling the same tired talking points irrespective of the facts of the case.  In the UCSB case, exactly the same number of Rodgers’ victims were killed by a knife as with a handgun.  That doesn’t matter to these nit wits.  If the NRA hadn’t “defined” the 2^nd Amendment the way they did those three victims would be alive today.  As for the knife victims?  Well that’s different.  They are just as dead for sure, but the lib left doesn’t care about that.  What they care about is getting guns out of the hands of law abiding citizen’s hands.

What jackazz Jerry is probably referring to is the difference between the “arms” at the time of the founding and today is quite profound.  That being the case, according to dolts like Jerry, a new “definition” of the 2^nd Amendment is necessary.  First there is an amendment process to “change the definition” of things found in the U.S. Constitution, but let’s ignore that small detail for now.  Instead let’s extend Jerry’s asinine logic to the first amendment.  Could the founders have foreseen the advent of tv, radio, cable, Internet etc?  So if Jerry wants to round up and ban everything that the founders could not have foreseen then maybe we should boot third-rate ambulance chasing sensationalist journos who think prying open Al Capone's safe would make for good live tv, off of the airwaves as well.  If that were ever purposed no doubt Jerry would contend that the 1^st Amendment doesn’t need “redefining.”

Then consider this.  How many “infringements” has congress already passed in violation of the 2^nd Amendment?  “Assault weapons” bans, ammo restrictions, background checks, CCW permitting, FFL licensing, gun bans, gun free zones etc. are all infringements.  None has stopped crazy people from acting as if they are crazy.  The VA Tech shooter violated a "gun free zone" and probably at least 3 dozen laws while committing his heinous act.  So Jerry, what other "definitions" do we need?

 

If there were three honest brokers on either side of the aisle in Caligula D.C., I’d almost support an amendment to the 2^nd Amendment.  The truth is there are not three people in the entirety of Caligula D.C. that could be trusted with such an important change.  Chucky Chuckles Schumer would be running the show.  Boner head Boehner and senate Rats would cower in fear of Harry the roach Reid taking to floor of the senate to tell lies about them.  So I’m happy to stand pat until such time as Caligula is populated by at least a couple of people willing to put the country and its citizens ahead of the Chamber of Commerce, NARAL, La Raza, NAACP, GLAAD and yes the NRA and other big money lobbies.

Last, I have seen Jerry a number of times on O'Really's show excusing illegals who murder, rape or kill entire families while driving drunk.  According to Jerry these incidents do not indicate the true nature of the hard working salt of the Earth illegals.  But some how for Jerry a crazy person with a gun indicates the true nature of all gun owners. GFY Jerry.  Maybe next time some drunk illegal will plow into you with his car and then finish you off with his fist, a hammer or baseball bat all of which kill far more people every year than guns.