Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Fake rape propels Lena Dunham to Lex's woman of the year

Lex’s woman of the year was an easy choice.  No it’s not the Shrilldabeast although she gets hung out to dry by my choice – details to emerge.  But I also need proof the beast is a woman.  I suspect she’s actually a cyborg.  It’s not fake Indian Lizzy Warren or any other pol either.  Although I strongly considered Mia Love the black Utah congresswoman whom I supported with my wallet as well as words.  If Boehner only had her spine.

My woman of the year was a tossup between the woman in the fake rape story at UVA and Lena Dunham.  I went with Dunham because her rape accusation is a clear lie.  The woman at UVA has a fake story about her but it’s still not certain that she wasn’t raped.  Dunham story is sheer BS.

How do you know?  Well when the story emerged that Dunham was raped by a college Republican named Barry – I thought this is just all too convenient.  It was a set up.  When it was checked out, it proved to be pure 100% pureed BS.  It never happened.  Dunham refuses to press charges and walked the story back just enough to give Barry the benefit of the doubt.

Fake rape stories, like fake racial notes left on dorm room white boards that turn to be left by the black woman who occupies the room, raise suspicion on actual rape and racial incidents.  Perpetrators of such hoaxes need to be prosecuted.  The people who lied to the Grand Jury in the Michael Brown shooting should be prosecuted if it can be proven that they lied.  They won’t be.  So people will continue to lie under oath.

But how does Dunham’s fake rape story hurt the Shrilldabeast?  As the chief enabler to the Dopes’ one man war on women, I guarantee you the beast doesn’t want rape to come up in the primary or general election.  If Rand Paul’s in your face “why don’t you ask the Clintons about their war on women” response becomes the pat answer for Republicans when confronted by a lapdog MSM about some phony war on women, I’d expect not hear anything about a war on women until after the election.   

So way to go Lena.  You’ve got the Shrilldabeast walking on thin ice – trust me she needs very thick ice - when it comes to rape and the “war on women.”

BONUS

This piece of trash showed up in the local fish wrap.  Lex responded. 

Anytime a liberal says he’s going to “stick to the facts,” you’d better get your front-end loader warmed up to remove the mountain of rubbish that is sure to follow.  So it is with Bob Dunderman’s letter “GOP talking points contrary to facts” GJ letters Dec 28, 2014.

Even if you stipulate that anyone who agreed with what every credible intelligence agency in world was saying about Iraq from about 1998 on was a “liar,” by focusing solely on the Bush administration, Dunderman is painting with a razor thin brush.  The Democrats’ chief warrior in their war on women - Bill Clinton, 82 Democrat representatives and 29 Democrat senators, including Senators Clinton and Kerry were saying the exact same thing as President Bush, at the time.

With regard to abortion, whatever the political lay of the land was for the 9 members of the Supreme Court in 1973, only a child who still believes in Santa Claus could be so ill informed as to argue that the Republican Party has not stood firmly on the side of life since.  Meanwhile, Democrats have encouraged the expansion of abortion to the point that they are now knocking on the door of infanticide.

With regard to “outsourcing,” President Obama’s failure to enforce immigration law and his unconstitutional executive order on amnesty have outsourced far more American jobs to foreign labor living here illegally than anything congress could ever dream. 

Last, regarding executive orders, Dunderman thinks total numbers are all that matter.  In his mind someone speeding 25 MPH over the limit down an abandoned stretch of I-80, in Wyoming, at one in the morning is worse than someone going 20 MPH over the limit through a crowded school zone at 2:30 in the afternoon.  Simple numbers don’t tell the whole story.

Print it and send me my Golden Pen.  Oh wait.  That honor is reserved only for writers willing to ape the JG’s leftist point of view.
http://journalgazette.net/opinion/letters/Letters-to-the-editor-4184236

No comments: