Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Foley, Hastert & Democrat hypocrisy

In another case of stunning hypocrisy, Democrats are wetting themselves in mock outrage at Congressman Mark Foley’s indiscretions and Speaker Hastert’s handling of the situation.

First Foley: Any political party that claims Studds (homosexual statutory rape with a 17 year old page inside the Capitol Building), Kennedy (philandering drunk who lets a woman die in the back seat of his car, waits hours before notifying the police), Frank (ticket fixing partner in a homosexual prostitution business run from his apartment), Clinton (philandering, lying, groping, accused rapist) as honored members of the party, ought to have the good sense to just shut the hell up.

Foley has resigned and is under investigation by the Justice department. It turns out that he’s been under investigation for some time by the FBI and several newspapers based on some “overly friendly” e-mails turned to over to the House leadership. Only after the salacious instant messaging bombshell hit did they and we discover what a pervert Foley really is.

Now Hastert: Does anyone else see any irony in the fact that the party that wants to confer all manner of civil rights and US Constitutional protections to terrorists trying to destroy us, is now demanding Hastert’s head before even a rudimentary investigation is completed? Does anyone else see any hypocrisy in the fact that the supposed party homosexual right and gay marriage is now saying that Hastert should have done something about Foley based on the odd e-mail messages, because after all everyone knew Foley was gay and that should have set off red lights? No pun Mr. Frank. Does anyone else see any double standard for Democrats arguing on the one hand that the Republicans “were trying to undo an election” when Democrat moral icon Bill Clinton got caught with trousers down in the oval office and on the other hand Democrats wanting Hastert to undo Florida’s 16th Congressional District election based on some odd e-mails, because after all, Foley’s gay?

Liberal: We shall know ye by your hypocrisy

No comments: