Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Wooppie! A 28th Amendment to protect homes and cars

A not so “wise African-American woman”

OK conspiracy theories are fun – to a point. To be a good conspiracy theory, “the theory” has to be based on something common sense tells us believable. The Kennedy shooting is a good example. How did one guy get off three accurate shots in such a short period of time with a bolt action rifle from a sixth story window?

Woopie dumb-@$$ debunks the entire moon program because she never saw the cameraman who took to pictures. YGBSM! Hey $h!t for brains. We never see the cameraman who shoots your worthless ugly @$$ everyday either. So I guess you don’t exist. Were it only true. That would mean one less clueless dope running around.

Homes, cars and guns

The Ft Wayne Urinal Gazette has run a couple of letters to the editor wondering why gun sales and ownership are not recorded and regulated like real estate sales and driving a car. Lex sent the following note:

I would like voice my agreement with a couple of letters to the editor that home ownership and the right to own and drive a car ought to have the same protections under the law as gun ownership. First, anyone who thinks that they own a home ought to stop paying taxes on it and see if they or the tax collector really “own” it.

But to put home, car and gun ownership all on equal footing under the law, all we need to do is pass an amendment to the constitution protecting home and car ownership from onerous government regulation.

How about something like:

Home ownership and transportation being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to own a home and operate basic transportation shall not be infringed.

This demonstrates a key difference between Liberal and Conservative theories of government. When confronted with government’s unequal regulation of several commodities, a Liberal’s first choice is to place the most severe government restrictions on all of the activities, while a Conservative will deregulate them all and let the people decide.

It is a sad, sad state when people do not know that homes, cars and guns are not regulated in the same manner because one is constitutionally protected. Absent that constitutional protection, the others are capriciously “regulated” by politicians primarily so that the government can raise taxes off of them and all activities connected to them.

No comments: