Monday, May 23, 2011

Without a Muslim reformation, a one state solution is the only answer

On Thursday the P-BO announced, “The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states.” To a person with a brain that sounds as if the P-BO is telling Israel, like the Beatles told JoJo, to get back to where they once belonged and where they belong is behind the 67 borders.

What the P-BO had no way of knowing, because he really didn’t want to know, is what Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu would have to say about the P-BO’s ill advised remarks. What Bibi told the P-BO in a round about way was, “Go pound sand.” Bibi said that the “Palestinians” had to understand that Israel would not return to the 67 borders because they were indefensible.

Problem is that it wasn’t the Palestinians who made the idiotic comment on Thursday. It was the guy sitting next Bibi, the P-BO.

It’s like you’re trying to get a message to your teenage son about drinking. Talking to him directly may set off an uncomfortable argument. So while jr. is eating his Cheerios at the breakfast table and you’re reading the morning paper, without even looking up you say aloud, “Oh my, a bunch of teenagers were busted for under aged drinking. How dumb are they. Don’t they know that the word always leaks out via Facebook, twitter, e-mail etc. about "the big party?" Some mom or the cops always gets wind of the party and the kids get busted. Only an idiot would even try. I’m very happy that you’re so much smarter than those kids.”

Bibi took the opportunity to lecture the P-BO about the right of return while he was at it. It ain’t going to happen. Don’t bring it up. Got it?

Well after being bludgeoned by the Israeli PM with a 4 foot club with a 10” spike run through the beating end and after being hacked off at the knees with a 20” chainsaw, the P-BO tried to do his best Emily Litela “never mind” at a Sunday speech at the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC:

"By definition, it means that the parties themselves - Israelis and Palestinians - will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967. That's what mutually agreed upon swaps means," the P-BO droned to a less than enthusiastic crowd.

Oh great and glorious buffoon what does “based on the 1967 lines” mean then?

What the P-BO doesn’t know and probably has no interest in learning, is that a Palestinian state has nothing to do with making Israel secure. The Arabs could have taken care of that decades ago, if they wanted to. The whole region was divided up and made out of whole cloth by the British 1922. Just move the lines around a bit.

The Palestinian state is just a visible cause that the Arabs use to attack Israel. The attacks won’t stop after the Palestinians get a state. The destruction of the Jewish state is the goal of many if not most Arabs in the region.

Stupid Americans and Eurotrash buy into the whole, “We have to give the Palestinians their own state” BS. The Palestinians and most Arabs don’t want a two state solution. They want a one state solution. They want Israel gone.

The really sad thing is what the P-BO and most people don’t get and that is this:

Until there is a great Muslim reformation where peace is preferable to spreading Islam by force, the one state solution is the only answer. I for one would prefer that the one state be a Jewish state that promotes freedom and liberty. There are already enough backward 8th century thinking people and states in the region. Does the world really need one more?

No comments: