A liar is gonna do what a liar does

Barrowing from Dickens, Shrillda the Hutt is a liar: to begin with.  There is no doubt whatever about that.   So who cares if Shrillda th Hutt looked cool, calm and collected while it lied?  The Hutt lies with the ease most healthy people draw a breath, or blink an eye.  That is, continuously, without a thought or notice of the process until it stops. 

When asked to describe Shrillda the Hutt, the first word that enters most people’s minds is – liar.  OK so a liar shows up at a House hearing and the public expects…what?  The truth?  Look, a liar gonna do what a liar does – lie.  And so it was with Shrillda the Hutt.  The fact that the lies were delivered with the cool professionalism of Sir Lawrence Olivier delivering a line from Hamlet does not make her BS the truth any more than the line makes Olivier a Danish prince.

So when the lies roll off the Hutt’s toad like tongue her sycophantic lemmings in the Dope party and the MSM  focus on how confidently the Hutt delivered the lies.  “She was magnificent.”  “Her performance was remarkable.”  “My oh, my.  She looked presidential,”  None of the azz lickers ever bother to look at the substance of what happened.  Shrillda the Hutt admitted in e-mails what everyone with brain already knew, the Benghazi attack was an organized terrorist attack that had nothing to with a video.  She lied about that.  During the hearing, when confronted with the e-mail she lied about that.

But the substance of what was said at the hearings makes no difference to the azz lickers.  The only thing that matters to this bunch of double d-bags is how the lies were delivered.  Because the lie were delivered well, the azz lickers say Shrillda the Hutt won the day.  I think the rest of America knows that Shrillda the Hutt is a liar.  There is no doubt whatever about that.